Desmopressin for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

D. A. Henry*, A. J. Moxey, P. A. Carless, D. O'Connell, B. McClelland, K. M. Henderson, K. Sly, A. Laupacis, D. Fergusson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted re-consideration of the use of allogeneic (from an unrelated donor) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and a range of techniques designed to minimise transfusion requirements. 

OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence for the efficacy of desmopressin (1-deamino-8-D-arginine-vasopressin), in reducing perioperative blood loss and the need for red cell transfusion in patients who do not have congenital bleeding disorders. 

SEARCH STRATEGY: Articles were identified by: computer searches of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents (to August 2000) and web sites of international health technology assessment agencies (to May 1998). References in the identified trials and review articles were checked and authors contacted to identify additional studies. 

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled parallel group trials in which adult patients, scheduled for non-urgent surgery, were randomised to DDAVP, or to a control group, who did not receive the intervention. 

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed using criteria proposed by Schulz et al. (1995) and Jadad et al. (1996). The principal outcomes were: the number of patients exposed to red cells, and the amount of blood transfused. Other clinical outcomes are detailed in the review. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen trials of DDAVP (N=1034) reported data on the proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion. In subjects treated with DDAVP the relative risk of exposure to peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion was 0.98 (95%CI: 0.88 to 1.10) compared with control. In DDAVP-treated patients the relative risk of requiring re-operation due to bleeding was 0.56 (95%CI: 0.18 to 1.73). There was no statistically significant effect overall for mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction in DDAVP-treated patients compared with control (RR=1.53: 95%CI: 0.58 to 4.05) and (RR=1.52: 95%CI: 0.67 to 3.49) respectively.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no convincing evidence that desmopressin minimises perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion in patients who do not have congenital bleeding disorders. These data suggest that there is no benefit of using DDAVP as a means of minimising perioperative allogeneic RBC transfusion. This meta-analysis had 90% power to detect a relative risk reduction of at least 17% for receiving a red cell transfusion at alpha = 0.05 (two-sided).

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD001884
JournalCochrane database of systematic reviews (Online)
Volume1998
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Dec 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Desmopressin for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this