TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining, identifying, and evaluating clinical trials of stuttering treatments: A tutorial for clinicians
AU - Onslow, Mark
AU - Jones, Mark
AU - O'Brian, Sue
AU - Menzies, Ross
AU - Packman, Ann
PY - 2008/11
Y1 - 2008/11
N2 - Purpose: To develop a method for clinicians to evaluate stuttering treatment efficacy research with very little burden of work. Method: The clinical trial is the most fundamental, clinically interpretable, and useful output unit of stuttering treatment research. We define a clinical trial of a stuttering treatment and specify 3 levels of clinical trials evidence. We use this taxonomy to identify and evaluate clinical trials of stuttering treatment. Our taxonomy draws on 2 fundamental principles of clinical trials used to evaluate health care: randomization and effect size. Results: Published clinical trials of stuttering treatments were identified and allocated to 1 of 3 levels of evidence. Conclusions: We outline a 3-step, semi-automated, Internet-based method to identify the publication of a report of stuttering treatment efficacy. For a report identified as such, a 10-item checklist is applied to verify its status as a clinical trial and to allocate it to 1 of 3 levels of clinical trials evidence. The present taxonomy reduces the burden of work of a 136-item checklist in an existing taxonomy.
AB - Purpose: To develop a method for clinicians to evaluate stuttering treatment efficacy research with very little burden of work. Method: The clinical trial is the most fundamental, clinically interpretable, and useful output unit of stuttering treatment research. We define a clinical trial of a stuttering treatment and specify 3 levels of clinical trials evidence. We use this taxonomy to identify and evaluate clinical trials of stuttering treatment. Our taxonomy draws on 2 fundamental principles of clinical trials used to evaluate health care: randomization and effect size. Results: Published clinical trials of stuttering treatments were identified and allocated to 1 of 3 levels of evidence. Conclusions: We outline a 3-step, semi-automated, Internet-based method to identify the publication of a report of stuttering treatment efficacy. For a report identified as such, a 10-item checklist is applied to verify its status as a clinical trial and to allocate it to 1 of 3 levels of clinical trials evidence. The present taxonomy reduces the burden of work of a 136-item checklist in an existing taxonomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55249090456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0047)
DO - 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0047)
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18840700
AN - SCOPUS:55249090456
SN - 1058-0360
VL - 17
SP - 401
EP - 415
JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
IS - 4
ER -