Declarations under part IIIA of the Trade Practices Act: The case for abolishing the public interest criterion

Brenda Marshall, Rachel Mulheron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In order to secure access to an infrastructure service by means of a declaration, the access seeker must prove that six criteria are satisfied. The last of these – that access (or increased access) to the service would not be contrary to the public interest – is the focus of this article. It is strongly contended here that the public interest criterion serves no purpose, and that, contrary to the Productivity Commission’s view, it should be abolished from the matrix of declaration criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-313
Number of pages18
JournalBond Law Review
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public interest
act
productivity
infrastructure

Cite this

@article{16474723625a4a5390f61be7e624c42a,
title = "Declarations under part IIIA of the Trade Practices Act: The case for abolishing the public interest criterion",
abstract = "In order to secure access to an infrastructure service by means of a declaration, the access seeker must prove that six criteria are satisfied. The last of these – that access (or increased access) to the service would not be contrary to the public interest – is the focus of this article. It is strongly contended here that the public interest criterion serves no purpose, and that, contrary to the Productivity Commission’s view, it should be abolished from the matrix of declaration criteria.",
author = "Brenda Marshall and Rachel Mulheron",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "296--313",
journal = "Bond Law Review",
issn = "1033-4505",
publisher = "Bond University Press",
number = "2",

}

Declarations under part IIIA of the Trade Practices Act : The case for abolishing the public interest criterion. / Marshall, Brenda; Mulheron, Rachel.

In: Bond Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2003, p. 296-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Declarations under part IIIA of the Trade Practices Act

T2 - The case for abolishing the public interest criterion

AU - Marshall, Brenda

AU - Mulheron, Rachel

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - In order to secure access to an infrastructure service by means of a declaration, the access seeker must prove that six criteria are satisfied. The last of these – that access (or increased access) to the service would not be contrary to the public interest – is the focus of this article. It is strongly contended here that the public interest criterion serves no purpose, and that, contrary to the Productivity Commission’s view, it should be abolished from the matrix of declaration criteria.

AB - In order to secure access to an infrastructure service by means of a declaration, the access seeker must prove that six criteria are satisfied. The last of these – that access (or increased access) to the service would not be contrary to the public interest – is the focus of this article. It is strongly contended here that the public interest criterion serves no purpose, and that, contrary to the Productivity Commission’s view, it should be abolished from the matrix of declaration criteria.

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 296

EP - 313

JO - Bond Law Review

JF - Bond Law Review

SN - 1033-4505

IS - 2

ER -