Dealing with resistance to change by legal academics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many law schools have in recent years responded to the mounting evidence of unusually high levels of psychological distress experienced by law students by attempting to introduce measures intended to ameliorate such distress and foster law student wellbeing. The responses by individual legal academics to these wellness initiatives are varied. Some academics embrace them with enthusiasm, some are ambivalent . . . and some appear determined to resist and oppose any efforts to make legal education less stressful and difficult for law students. This chapter examines the nature of academic resistance to wellness initiatives: identifying the various forms of resistance engaged in by academics; describing the various reasons and justifications for the resistance; and offering some possible strategies for addressing the resistance
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPromoting law student and lawyer well-being in Australia and beyond
EditorsRachel Field, James Duffy, Colin James
Place of PublicationAbingdon, UK
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Pages204-217
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781317074748
ISBN (Print)9781472445292
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dealing with resistance to change by legal academics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    James, N. (2016). Dealing with resistance to change by legal academics. In R. Field, J. Duffy, & C. James (Eds.), Promoting law student and lawyer well-being in Australia and beyond (pp. 204-217). Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602530-24