Data Driven Innovation, Privacy and National Sovereignty in a Global World-Two 2018 Key Cases on Internet Jurisdition

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction:
Anyone who has been following the evolution of the law on Internet jurisdiction would have noticed the ebb and flow of developments. With decisions such as the Canadian Supreme Court's ruling in Google v Equustek, 1 the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) decision in Bolagsupplysningen OOZ and the Supreme Court of New South Wales' ruling in Xv Twitter,3 2017 signalled that we are in a period of serious flow. However, the cases of 201 7 pale in significance when viewed next to what we can expect from 2018.
In 2018, we will get to experience the Supreme Court of the United States' hearing and decision in the much-anticipated MicrosoftWarrantcase.4 And we will also see the CJEU's hearing, and possibly decision, in the arguably even more important Google France case.5
I devote this contribution to an analysis of these two cases, both of which may significantly impact data driven innovation, privacy and national sovereignty in a global world.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationData-Driven Innovation, privacidad y soberania nacional en un mundo global
EditorsDan Jerker B. Svantesson, Edison Lanza, Michael J. Camilleri
Place of PublicationMadrid
PublisherCEU Ediciones
Pages11-31
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)978-84-17385-00-2
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameCuadernos de la Catedra Google sobre Privacidad, Sociedad e Innovacion
PublisherCEU Ediciones
Number3

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Data Driven Innovation, Privacy and National Sovereignty in a Global World-Two 2018 Key Cases on Internet Jurisdition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this