Custodians of the Game: Ethical Considerations for Football Governing Bodies in Regulating Concussion Management

Annette Greenhow, Jocelyn East

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concussion in professional football is a topic that has generated a significant amount of interest for many years, partly due in recent times to the filing of the class-action litigation and the uncapped compensation injury fund and settlement involving 4,500 retired professional players and the National Football League (NFL). The proceedings claimed that the NFL, as the governing body of American football, failed in its duty to protect players’ health during their professional playing careers by exposing players to risks of repetitive concussions and actively concealing links to potential long-term consequences. The NFL litigation sharpened the focus on the fundamental regulatory, governance and ethical considerations for football governing bodies, as self-regulated organisations, when governing the delicate balance between the dynamics of contact and collision sports, entertainment and player-health considerations. It also raised questions about public accountability and responsibilities to all levels of the sport through a framework of public health ethics. The NFL litigation and Congressional hearings have led to changes within the NFL and its regulatory and governance responses. A case study of the NFL responses to concussion in the sport of American football can provide insight into concussion regulation. Australian football governing bodies can align their regulatory and governance responses to concussion within their sports with the aim to avoid similar accusations, and circumvent a more coercive form of intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-82
Number of pages18
JournalNeuroethics
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Football
Sports
Jurisprudence
Social Responsibility
Health
Financial Management
Compensation and Redress
Ethics
Hearing
Public Health
Organizations

Cite this

@article{41a1e288250b496a8bcc97a8a2913fbe,
title = "Custodians of the Game: Ethical Considerations for Football Governing Bodies in Regulating Concussion Management",
abstract = "Concussion in professional football is a topic that has generated a significant amount of interest for many years, partly due in recent times to the filing of the class-action litigation and the uncapped compensation injury fund and settlement involving 4,500 retired professional players and the National Football League (NFL). The proceedings claimed that the NFL, as the governing body of American football, failed in its duty to protect players’ health during their professional playing careers by exposing players to risks of repetitive concussions and actively concealing links to potential long-term consequences. The NFL litigation sharpened the focus on the fundamental regulatory, governance and ethical considerations for football governing bodies, as self-regulated organisations, when governing the delicate balance between the dynamics of contact and collision sports, entertainment and player-health considerations. It also raised questions about public accountability and responsibilities to all levels of the sport through a framework of public health ethics. The NFL litigation and Congressional hearings have led to changes within the NFL and its regulatory and governance responses. A case study of the NFL responses to concussion in the sport of American football can provide insight into concussion regulation. Australian football governing bodies can align their regulatory and governance responses to concussion within their sports with the aim to avoid similar accusations, and circumvent a more coercive form of intervention.",
author = "Annette Greenhow and Jocelyn East",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12152-014-9216-1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "65--82",
journal = "Neuroethics",
issn = "1874-5490",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Custodians of the Game : Ethical Considerations for Football Governing Bodies in Regulating Concussion Management. / Greenhow, Annette; East, Jocelyn.

In: Neuroethics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.04.2015, p. 65-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Custodians of the Game

T2 - Ethical Considerations for Football Governing Bodies in Regulating Concussion Management

AU - Greenhow, Annette

AU - East, Jocelyn

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Concussion in professional football is a topic that has generated a significant amount of interest for many years, partly due in recent times to the filing of the class-action litigation and the uncapped compensation injury fund and settlement involving 4,500 retired professional players and the National Football League (NFL). The proceedings claimed that the NFL, as the governing body of American football, failed in its duty to protect players’ health during their professional playing careers by exposing players to risks of repetitive concussions and actively concealing links to potential long-term consequences. The NFL litigation sharpened the focus on the fundamental regulatory, governance and ethical considerations for football governing bodies, as self-regulated organisations, when governing the delicate balance between the dynamics of contact and collision sports, entertainment and player-health considerations. It also raised questions about public accountability and responsibilities to all levels of the sport through a framework of public health ethics. The NFL litigation and Congressional hearings have led to changes within the NFL and its regulatory and governance responses. A case study of the NFL responses to concussion in the sport of American football can provide insight into concussion regulation. Australian football governing bodies can align their regulatory and governance responses to concussion within their sports with the aim to avoid similar accusations, and circumvent a more coercive form of intervention.

AB - Concussion in professional football is a topic that has generated a significant amount of interest for many years, partly due in recent times to the filing of the class-action litigation and the uncapped compensation injury fund and settlement involving 4,500 retired professional players and the National Football League (NFL). The proceedings claimed that the NFL, as the governing body of American football, failed in its duty to protect players’ health during their professional playing careers by exposing players to risks of repetitive concussions and actively concealing links to potential long-term consequences. The NFL litigation sharpened the focus on the fundamental regulatory, governance and ethical considerations for football governing bodies, as self-regulated organisations, when governing the delicate balance between the dynamics of contact and collision sports, entertainment and player-health considerations. It also raised questions about public accountability and responsibilities to all levels of the sport through a framework of public health ethics. The NFL litigation and Congressional hearings have led to changes within the NFL and its regulatory and governance responses. A case study of the NFL responses to concussion in the sport of American football can provide insight into concussion regulation. Australian football governing bodies can align their regulatory and governance responses to concussion within their sports with the aim to avoid similar accusations, and circumvent a more coercive form of intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939885683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12152-014-9216-1

DO - 10.1007/s12152-014-9216-1

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 65

EP - 82

JO - Neuroethics

JF - Neuroethics

SN - 1874-5490

IS - 1

ER -