Cross-cultural differences in coping, connectedness and psychological distress among university students

Tara Shaye Bales, Aileen M. Pidgeon, Barbara C Y Lo, Peta Berenice Stapleton, Heidi B Magyar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Globally the high prevalence of psychological distress among university students is concerning. Two factors associated with low psychological distress among university students are adaptive coping strategies and campus connectedness. The current study examines the cross-cultural differences among university students across three countries, Australia, United States of America and Hong Kong in the utilization of academic coping strategies, levels of campus connectedness and psychological distress. Cross-cultural differences were examined using the theory of cultural orientations; individualism and collectivism. Participants consisted of 217 university students. The results indicated no significant differences between the countries on individualism or collectivism or on the reported use of academic coping strategies and levels of campus connectedness. Lower use of avoidance coping and higher levels of campus connectedness predicted significantly lower psychological distress for university students in all countries. The implications of the results are discussed along with limitations and future directions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-125
Number of pages12
Journal International Journal for Innovation Education and Research
Volume3
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

cultural difference
coping
university
collectivism
individualism
student
Hong Kong
utilization

Cite this

@article{721d51cdc2904a9ebc56aefb71a4b890,
title = "Cross-cultural differences in coping, connectedness and psychological distress among university students",
abstract = "Globally the high prevalence of psychological distress among university students is concerning. Two factors associated with low psychological distress among university students are adaptive coping strategies and campus connectedness. The current study examines the cross-cultural differences among university students across three countries, Australia, United States of America and Hong Kong in the utilization of academic coping strategies, levels of campus connectedness and psychological distress. Cross-cultural differences were examined using the theory of cultural orientations; individualism and collectivism. Participants consisted of 217 university students. The results indicated no significant differences between the countries on individualism or collectivism or on the reported use of academic coping strategies and levels of campus connectedness. Lower use of avoidance coping and higher levels of campus connectedness predicted significantly lower psychological distress for university students in all countries. The implications of the results are discussed along with limitations and future directions.",
author = "Bales, {Tara Shaye} and Pidgeon, {Aileen M.} and Lo, {Barbara C Y} and Stapleton, {Peta Berenice} and Magyar, {Heidi B}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "114--125",
journal = "International Journal for Innovation Education and Research",
issn = "2411-2933",
publisher = "International Educative Research Foundation and Publisher",
number = "2",

}

Cross-cultural differences in coping, connectedness and psychological distress among university students. / Bales, Tara Shaye; Pidgeon, Aileen M.; Lo, Barbara C Y; Stapleton, Peta Berenice; Magyar, Heidi B.

In: International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2015, p. 114-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-cultural differences in coping, connectedness and psychological distress among university students

AU - Bales, Tara Shaye

AU - Pidgeon, Aileen M.

AU - Lo, Barbara C Y

AU - Stapleton, Peta Berenice

AU - Magyar, Heidi B

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Globally the high prevalence of psychological distress among university students is concerning. Two factors associated with low psychological distress among university students are adaptive coping strategies and campus connectedness. The current study examines the cross-cultural differences among university students across three countries, Australia, United States of America and Hong Kong in the utilization of academic coping strategies, levels of campus connectedness and psychological distress. Cross-cultural differences were examined using the theory of cultural orientations; individualism and collectivism. Participants consisted of 217 university students. The results indicated no significant differences between the countries on individualism or collectivism or on the reported use of academic coping strategies and levels of campus connectedness. Lower use of avoidance coping and higher levels of campus connectedness predicted significantly lower psychological distress for university students in all countries. The implications of the results are discussed along with limitations and future directions.

AB - Globally the high prevalence of psychological distress among university students is concerning. Two factors associated with low psychological distress among university students are adaptive coping strategies and campus connectedness. The current study examines the cross-cultural differences among university students across three countries, Australia, United States of America and Hong Kong in the utilization of academic coping strategies, levels of campus connectedness and psychological distress. Cross-cultural differences were examined using the theory of cultural orientations; individualism and collectivism. Participants consisted of 217 university students. The results indicated no significant differences between the countries on individualism or collectivism or on the reported use of academic coping strategies and levels of campus connectedness. Lower use of avoidance coping and higher levels of campus connectedness predicted significantly lower psychological distress for university students in all countries. The implications of the results are discussed along with limitations and future directions.

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 114

EP - 125

JO - International Journal for Innovation Education and Research

JF - International Journal for Innovation Education and Research

SN - 2411-2933

IS - 2

ER -