Critical thinking, curiosity and parsimony in (emergency) medicine: ‘Doing nothing’ as a quality measure?

Gerben Keijzers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Current medical decision-making is influenced by many factors, such as competing interests, distractions, as well as fear of missing an important diagnosis. This can result in ordering tests or providing treatments that can be harmful. Unnecessary tests are more likely to lead to false positive diagnosis or incidental findings that are of uncertain clinical relevance. Estimates indicate that almost one-third of all health spending is wasteful. The ‘Choosing Wisely’ campaign has identified many of these wasteful tests and treatments. This perspective proposes some suggestions to focus on our critical thinking, embrace shared decision-making and stay curious about the patient we are treating. Most importantly, ‘doing nothing’ could be a quality indicator for EDs, and ACEM supported audits and research to develop benchmarks for certain tests and procedures in the ED are important to achieve a cultural change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-362
Number of pages3
JournalEMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Exploratory Behavior
Emergency Medicine
Benchmarking
Incidental Findings
Fear
Decision Making
Health
Therapeutics
Research
Thinking
Clinical Decision-Making

Cite this

@article{e681ec48237e43eda0e6e5229e60fe06,
title = "Critical thinking, curiosity and parsimony in (emergency) medicine: ‘Doing nothing’ as a quality measure?",
abstract = "Current medical decision-making is influenced by many factors, such as competing interests, distractions, as well as fear of missing an important diagnosis. This can result in ordering tests or providing treatments that can be harmful. Unnecessary tests are more likely to lead to false positive diagnosis or incidental findings that are of uncertain clinical relevance. Estimates indicate that almost one-third of all health spending is wasteful. The ‘Choosing Wisely’ campaign has identified many of these wasteful tests and treatments. This perspective proposes some suggestions to focus on our critical thinking, embrace shared decision-making and stay curious about the patient we are treating. Most importantly, ‘doing nothing’ could be a quality indicator for EDs, and ACEM supported audits and research to develop benchmarks for certain tests and procedures in the ED are important to achieve a cultural change.",
author = "Gerben Keijzers",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1742-6723.12782",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "360--362",
journal = "Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1742-6723",
publisher = "Wiley-Academy",
number = "3",

}

Critical thinking, curiosity and parsimony in (emergency) medicine : ‘Doing nothing’ as a quality measure? / Keijzers, Gerben.

In: EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 360-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical thinking, curiosity and parsimony in (emergency) medicine

T2 - ‘Doing nothing’ as a quality measure?

AU - Keijzers, Gerben

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Current medical decision-making is influenced by many factors, such as competing interests, distractions, as well as fear of missing an important diagnosis. This can result in ordering tests or providing treatments that can be harmful. Unnecessary tests are more likely to lead to false positive diagnosis or incidental findings that are of uncertain clinical relevance. Estimates indicate that almost one-third of all health spending is wasteful. The ‘Choosing Wisely’ campaign has identified many of these wasteful tests and treatments. This perspective proposes some suggestions to focus on our critical thinking, embrace shared decision-making and stay curious about the patient we are treating. Most importantly, ‘doing nothing’ could be a quality indicator for EDs, and ACEM supported audits and research to develop benchmarks for certain tests and procedures in the ED are important to achieve a cultural change.

AB - Current medical decision-making is influenced by many factors, such as competing interests, distractions, as well as fear of missing an important diagnosis. This can result in ordering tests or providing treatments that can be harmful. Unnecessary tests are more likely to lead to false positive diagnosis or incidental findings that are of uncertain clinical relevance. Estimates indicate that almost one-third of all health spending is wasteful. The ‘Choosing Wisely’ campaign has identified many of these wasteful tests and treatments. This perspective proposes some suggestions to focus on our critical thinking, embrace shared decision-making and stay curious about the patient we are treating. Most importantly, ‘doing nothing’ could be a quality indicator for EDs, and ACEM supported audits and research to develop benchmarks for certain tests and procedures in the ED are important to achieve a cultural change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018981366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.12782

DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.12782

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 360

EP - 362

JO - Emergency Medicine

JF - Emergency Medicine

SN - 1742-6723

IS - 3

ER -