Criteria for monitoring tests were described: Validity, responsiveness, detectability of long-term change, and practicality

Katy J L Bell, Paul P. Glasziou, Andrew Hayen, Les Irwig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To describe how evidence from trials and cohort studies may be used to guide choice of test for monitoring patients with chronic disease. Study Design and Setting Exploration of potential criteria for choosing the best monitoring test. Criteria are defined and options for assessment measures for test performance on each criterion discussed. Results Monitoring in clinical practice occurs in three main phases: before treatment, response to treatment, and long-term monitoring. Four important criteria may be used to choose the best test for monitoring a patient in each of these phases. Clinical validity describes the ability of the test to predict the clinically relevant outcome that we are trying to control or prevent. Responsiveness describes how much the test changes in response to an intervention relative to background random variation. Detectability of long-term change describes the size of changes in the test over the long term relative to background random variation. Practicality describes the ease of use, invasiveness, and cost of the test. Test performance generally requires longitudinal data from trial and/or cohort studies using statistical methods such as those discussed. Conclusion Four specific criteria can help clinicians inform evidence-based decisions on which monitoring test to use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-159
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Physiologic Monitoring
Cohort Studies
Chronic Disease
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

@article{4c25f010c6004aa2881d449e2ea14781,
title = "Criteria for monitoring tests were described: Validity, responsiveness, detectability of long-term change, and practicality",
abstract = "Objectives To describe how evidence from trials and cohort studies may be used to guide choice of test for monitoring patients with chronic disease. Study Design and Setting Exploration of potential criteria for choosing the best monitoring test. Criteria are defined and options for assessment measures for test performance on each criterion discussed. Results Monitoring in clinical practice occurs in three main phases: before treatment, response to treatment, and long-term monitoring. Four important criteria may be used to choose the best test for monitoring a patient in each of these phases. Clinical validity describes the ability of the test to predict the clinically relevant outcome that we are trying to control or prevent. Responsiveness describes how much the test changes in response to an intervention relative to background random variation. Detectability of long-term change describes the size of changes in the test over the long term relative to background random variation. Practicality describes the ease of use, invasiveness, and cost of the test. Test performance generally requires longitudinal data from trial and/or cohort studies using statistical methods such as those discussed. Conclusion Four specific criteria can help clinicians inform evidence-based decisions on which monitoring test to use.",
author = "Bell, {Katy J L} and Glasziou, {Paul P.} and Andrew Hayen and Les Irwig",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.015",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "152--159",
journal = "Journal of Chronic Diseases",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Criteria for monitoring tests were described : Validity, responsiveness, detectability of long-term change, and practicality. / Bell, Katy J L; Glasziou, Paul P.; Hayen, Andrew; Irwig, Les.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 67, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 152-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria for monitoring tests were described

T2 - Validity, responsiveness, detectability of long-term change, and practicality

AU - Bell, Katy J L

AU - Glasziou, Paul P.

AU - Hayen, Andrew

AU - Irwig, Les

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objectives To describe how evidence from trials and cohort studies may be used to guide choice of test for monitoring patients with chronic disease. Study Design and Setting Exploration of potential criteria for choosing the best monitoring test. Criteria are defined and options for assessment measures for test performance on each criterion discussed. Results Monitoring in clinical practice occurs in three main phases: before treatment, response to treatment, and long-term monitoring. Four important criteria may be used to choose the best test for monitoring a patient in each of these phases. Clinical validity describes the ability of the test to predict the clinically relevant outcome that we are trying to control or prevent. Responsiveness describes how much the test changes in response to an intervention relative to background random variation. Detectability of long-term change describes the size of changes in the test over the long term relative to background random variation. Practicality describes the ease of use, invasiveness, and cost of the test. Test performance generally requires longitudinal data from trial and/or cohort studies using statistical methods such as those discussed. Conclusion Four specific criteria can help clinicians inform evidence-based decisions on which monitoring test to use.

AB - Objectives To describe how evidence from trials and cohort studies may be used to guide choice of test for monitoring patients with chronic disease. Study Design and Setting Exploration of potential criteria for choosing the best monitoring test. Criteria are defined and options for assessment measures for test performance on each criterion discussed. Results Monitoring in clinical practice occurs in three main phases: before treatment, response to treatment, and long-term monitoring. Four important criteria may be used to choose the best test for monitoring a patient in each of these phases. Clinical validity describes the ability of the test to predict the clinically relevant outcome that we are trying to control or prevent. Responsiveness describes how much the test changes in response to an intervention relative to background random variation. Detectability of long-term change describes the size of changes in the test over the long term relative to background random variation. Practicality describes the ease of use, invasiveness, and cost of the test. Test performance generally requires longitudinal data from trial and/or cohort studies using statistical methods such as those discussed. Conclusion Four specific criteria can help clinicians inform evidence-based decisions on which monitoring test to use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891629036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.015

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 152

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases

JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 2

ER -