TY - JOUR
T1 - COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Siebenhofer, Andrea
AU - Scott, Anna Mae
AU - Avian, Alexander
AU - Terebessy, András
AU - Mergenthal, Karola
AU - Schaffler-Schaden, Dagmar
AU - Bachler, Herbert
AU - Huter, Sebastian
AU - Zelko, Erika
AU - Murray, Amanda
AU - Guppy, Michelle
AU - Piccoliori, Giuliano
AU - Streit, Sven
AU - Jeitler, Klaus
AU - Flamm, Maria
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank all participating general practitioners and the institutions that were willing to send the link to our questionnaire to their network partners.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Siebenhofer, Scott, Avian, Terebessy, Mergenthal, Schaffler-Schaden, Bachler, Huter, Zelko, Murray, Guppy, Piccoliori, Streit, Jeitler and Flamm.
PY - 2022/12/6
Y1 - 2022/12/6
N2 - OBJECTIVES: General practitioners (GPs) are frequently patients' first point of contact with the healthcare system and play an important role in identifying, managing and monitoring cases. This study investigated the experiences of GPs from seven different countries in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.DESIGN: International cross-sectional online survey.SETTING: General practitioners from Australia, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland.PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 1,642 GPs completed the survey.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We focused on how well-prepared GPs were, their self-confidence and concerns, efforts to control the spread of the disease, patient contacts, information flow, testing procedures and protection of staff.RESULTS: GPs gave high ratings to their self-confidence (7.3, 95% CI 7.1-7.5) and their efforts to control the spread of the disease (7.2, 95% CI 7.0-7.3). A decrease in the number of patient contacts (5.7, 95% CI 5.4-5.9), the perception of risk (5.3 95% CI 4.9-5.6), the provision of information to GPs (4.9, 95% CI 4.6-5.2), their testing of suspected cases (3.7, 95% CI 3.4-3.9) and their preparedness to face a pandemic (mean: 3.5; 95% CI 3.2-3.7) were rated as moderate. GPs gave low ratings to their ability to protect staff (2.2 95% CI 1.9-2.4). Differences were identified in all dimensions except protection of staff, which was consistently low in all surveyed GPs and countries.CONCLUSION: Although GPs in the different countries were confronted with the same pandemic, its impact on specific aspects differed. This partly reflected differences in health care systems and experience of recent pandemics. However, it also showed that the development of structured care plans in case of future infectious diseases requires the early involvement of primary care representatives.
AB - OBJECTIVES: General practitioners (GPs) are frequently patients' first point of contact with the healthcare system and play an important role in identifying, managing and monitoring cases. This study investigated the experiences of GPs from seven different countries in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.DESIGN: International cross-sectional online survey.SETTING: General practitioners from Australia, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland.PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 1,642 GPs completed the survey.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We focused on how well-prepared GPs were, their self-confidence and concerns, efforts to control the spread of the disease, patient contacts, information flow, testing procedures and protection of staff.RESULTS: GPs gave high ratings to their self-confidence (7.3, 95% CI 7.1-7.5) and their efforts to control the spread of the disease (7.2, 95% CI 7.0-7.3). A decrease in the number of patient contacts (5.7, 95% CI 5.4-5.9), the perception of risk (5.3 95% CI 4.9-5.6), the provision of information to GPs (4.9, 95% CI 4.6-5.2), their testing of suspected cases (3.7, 95% CI 3.4-3.9) and their preparedness to face a pandemic (mean: 3.5; 95% CI 3.2-3.7) were rated as moderate. GPs gave low ratings to their ability to protect staff (2.2 95% CI 1.9-2.4). Differences were identified in all dimensions except protection of staff, which was consistently low in all surveyed GPs and countries.CONCLUSION: Although GPs in the different countries were confronted with the same pandemic, its impact on specific aspects differed. This partly reflected differences in health care systems and experience of recent pandemics. However, it also showed that the development of structured care plans in case of future infectious diseases requires the early involvement of primary care representatives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145394837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072515
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072515
M3 - Article
C2 - 36600939
SN - 2296-2565
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
M1 - 1072515
ER -