Couple adjustment to a stressful life event: A dyadic investigation of the roles of positive reframing and perceived benefits

Christina Samios, Shayne Baran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives. This study examines positive reframing (a form of meaning making), perceived benefits (a form of meanings made) and adjustment in couples who experienced a stressful life event in the past year. This study tested whether couple members’ scores were nonindependent and whether one’s own perceived benefits was predicted by their own positive reframing (actor effect) as well as their partner’s positive reframing (partner effect). Further, this study tested actor and partner effects for the link between perceived benefits and adjustment and whether positive reframing (the initial variable) works through perceived benefits (the mediator) to affect adjustment (the outcome) at the dyadic level. Design. A standard dyadic design was used. Methods. Eighty couples completed measures of positive reframing, perceived benefits, and adjustment (depression, anxiety, positive affect, life satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction). Results. Partners’ scores on study variables were related, and although only actor effects were found for the path between positive reframing and perceived benefits, both actor and partner effects were found for the path between perceived benefits and adjustment. Mediation was found for actor–actor and actor-partner indirect effects. Conclusions. Results indicate that a greater focus on interpersonal factors is needed to further meaning-making theory and inform practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-205
Number of pages18
JournalAnxiety, Stress and Coping
Volume31
Issue number2
Early online date22 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Anxiety
Life Events
Reframing
Depression

Cite this

@article{29b0fbcb56e7486b852c9128f9ccb45d,
title = "Couple adjustment to a stressful life event: A dyadic investigation of the roles of positive reframing and perceived benefits",
abstract = "Background and Objectives. This study examines positive reframing (a form of meaning making), perceived benefits (a form of meanings made) and adjustment in couples who experienced a stressful life event in the past year. This study tested whether couple members’ scores were nonindependent and whether one’s own perceived benefits was predicted by their own positive reframing (actor effect) as well as their partner’s positive reframing (partner effect). Further, this study tested actor and partner effects for the link between perceived benefits and adjustment and whether positive reframing (the initial variable) works through perceived benefits (the mediator) to affect adjustment (the outcome) at the dyadic level. Design. A standard dyadic design was used. Methods. Eighty couples completed measures of positive reframing, perceived benefits, and adjustment (depression, anxiety, positive affect, life satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction). Results. Partners’ scores on study variables were related, and although only actor effects were found for the path between positive reframing and perceived benefits, both actor and partner effects were found for the path between perceived benefits and adjustment. Mediation was found for actor–actor and actor-partner indirect effects. Conclusions. Results indicate that a greater focus on interpersonal factors is needed to further meaning-making theory and inform practice.",
author = "Christina Samios and Shayne Baran",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10615806.2017.1420173",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "188--205",
journal = "Anxiety, Stress and Coping",
issn = "1061-5806",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Couple adjustment to a stressful life event : A dyadic investigation of the roles of positive reframing and perceived benefits. / Samios, Christina; Baran, Shayne.

In: Anxiety, Stress and Coping, Vol. 31, No. 2, 04.03.2018, p. 188-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Couple adjustment to a stressful life event

T2 - A dyadic investigation of the roles of positive reframing and perceived benefits

AU - Samios, Christina

AU - Baran, Shayne

PY - 2018/3/4

Y1 - 2018/3/4

N2 - Background and Objectives. This study examines positive reframing (a form of meaning making), perceived benefits (a form of meanings made) and adjustment in couples who experienced a stressful life event in the past year. This study tested whether couple members’ scores were nonindependent and whether one’s own perceived benefits was predicted by their own positive reframing (actor effect) as well as their partner’s positive reframing (partner effect). Further, this study tested actor and partner effects for the link between perceived benefits and adjustment and whether positive reframing (the initial variable) works through perceived benefits (the mediator) to affect adjustment (the outcome) at the dyadic level. Design. A standard dyadic design was used. Methods. Eighty couples completed measures of positive reframing, perceived benefits, and adjustment (depression, anxiety, positive affect, life satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction). Results. Partners’ scores on study variables were related, and although only actor effects were found for the path between positive reframing and perceived benefits, both actor and partner effects were found for the path between perceived benefits and adjustment. Mediation was found for actor–actor and actor-partner indirect effects. Conclusions. Results indicate that a greater focus on interpersonal factors is needed to further meaning-making theory and inform practice.

AB - Background and Objectives. This study examines positive reframing (a form of meaning making), perceived benefits (a form of meanings made) and adjustment in couples who experienced a stressful life event in the past year. This study tested whether couple members’ scores were nonindependent and whether one’s own perceived benefits was predicted by their own positive reframing (actor effect) as well as their partner’s positive reframing (partner effect). Further, this study tested actor and partner effects for the link between perceived benefits and adjustment and whether positive reframing (the initial variable) works through perceived benefits (the mediator) to affect adjustment (the outcome) at the dyadic level. Design. A standard dyadic design was used. Methods. Eighty couples completed measures of positive reframing, perceived benefits, and adjustment (depression, anxiety, positive affect, life satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction). Results. Partners’ scores on study variables were related, and although only actor effects were found for the path between positive reframing and perceived benefits, both actor and partner effects were found for the path between perceived benefits and adjustment. Mediation was found for actor–actor and actor-partner indirect effects. Conclusions. Results indicate that a greater focus on interpersonal factors is needed to further meaning-making theory and inform practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038833647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10615806.2017.1420173

DO - 10.1080/10615806.2017.1420173

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 188

EP - 205

JO - Anxiety, Stress and Coping

JF - Anxiety, Stress and Coping

SN - 1061-5806

IS - 2

ER -