Copyright, Art and Originality: Comparative and Policy Issues

William Van Caenegem, Lucie Tréguier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article reviews the laws of France and of Australia in relation to artistic works copyright for useful articles. Australian law applies a different subsistence test to ‘applied art’ than to fine art, whereas French law makes no such distinction, applying the principle of ‘Unité de l’art’. The decision of the High Court of Australia in IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] 239 clr 458 , which aligns the standard of originality more closely with that applied in European copyright law, invites reconsideration of the Australian approach in favour of a universal standard for all artistic works. A more contemporary understanding of what constitutes ‘art’ points in the same direction. In the result, there is no longer any need to apply a restrictive ‘artistic quality’ standard to works of applied art in Australia. Such an approach better aligns the tests of artistic copyright subsistence in different jurisdictions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-127
Number of pages33
JournalGlobal Journal of Comparative Law
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

art
Law
fine arts
France

Cite this

@article{9e1479964f6447c8bbd957f771209e5f,
title = "Copyright, Art and Originality: Comparative and Policy Issues",
abstract = "This article reviews the laws of France and of Australia in relation to artistic works copyright for useful articles. Australian law applies a different subsistence test to ‘applied art’ than to fine art, whereas French law makes no such distinction, applying the principle of ‘Unit{\'e} de l’art’. The decision of the High Court of Australia in IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] 239 clr 458 , which aligns the standard of originality more closely with that applied in European copyright law, invites reconsideration of the Australian approach in favour of a universal standard for all artistic works. A more contemporary understanding of what constitutes ‘art’ points in the same direction. In the result, there is no longer any need to apply a restrictive ‘artistic quality’ standard to works of applied art in Australia. Such an approach better aligns the tests of artistic copyright subsistence in different jurisdictions.",
author = "{Van Caenegem}, William and Lucie Tr{\'e}guier",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1163/2211906X-00802001",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "95--127",
journal = "Global Journal of Comparative Law",
issn = "2211-9051",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

Copyright, Art and Originality: Comparative and Policy Issues. / Van Caenegem, William; Tréguier, Lucie.

In: Global Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, 25.09.2019, p. 95-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Copyright, Art and Originality: Comparative and Policy Issues

AU - Van Caenegem, William

AU - Tréguier, Lucie

PY - 2019/9/25

Y1 - 2019/9/25

N2 - This article reviews the laws of France and of Australia in relation to artistic works copyright for useful articles. Australian law applies a different subsistence test to ‘applied art’ than to fine art, whereas French law makes no such distinction, applying the principle of ‘Unité de l’art’. The decision of the High Court of Australia in IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] 239 clr 458 , which aligns the standard of originality more closely with that applied in European copyright law, invites reconsideration of the Australian approach in favour of a universal standard for all artistic works. A more contemporary understanding of what constitutes ‘art’ points in the same direction. In the result, there is no longer any need to apply a restrictive ‘artistic quality’ standard to works of applied art in Australia. Such an approach better aligns the tests of artistic copyright subsistence in different jurisdictions.

AB - This article reviews the laws of France and of Australia in relation to artistic works copyright for useful articles. Australian law applies a different subsistence test to ‘applied art’ than to fine art, whereas French law makes no such distinction, applying the principle of ‘Unité de l’art’. The decision of the High Court of Australia in IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] 239 clr 458 , which aligns the standard of originality more closely with that applied in European copyright law, invites reconsideration of the Australian approach in favour of a universal standard for all artistic works. A more contemporary understanding of what constitutes ‘art’ points in the same direction. In the result, there is no longer any need to apply a restrictive ‘artistic quality’ standard to works of applied art in Australia. Such an approach better aligns the tests of artistic copyright subsistence in different jurisdictions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072990802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/2211906X-00802001

DO - 10.1163/2211906X-00802001

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 95

EP - 127

JO - Global Journal of Comparative Law

JF - Global Journal of Comparative Law

SN - 2211-9051

IS - 2

ER -