Conviction and punishment: Free press and competitive election as deterrents to corruption

Xiaowen Tian, Vai Io Lo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Democratic institutions are not equally effective in curbing corruption. Using a criminal behavior model, this study formulates the hypothesis that corruption offenders, being risk-inclined, are deterred more by conviction-reinforcing democratic institutions than by punishment-reinforcing democratic institutions. Evidence based on cross-country regressions strongly supports this hypothesis, indicating that compared with competitive election, free press is a more effective deterrent to corruption. While shedding light on why corruption remains rampant in some electoral democracies - particularly the illiberal democracies - this study identifies a key to corruption control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-172
Number of pages18
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conviction and punishment: Free press and competitive election as deterrents to corruption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this