Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Extract
The legitimate goals of legal education, and the demands made on an already crowded curriculum, are overwhelming. Commentators and policymakers point to the importance of teaching ‘core knowledge’, law in context (with an interdisciplinary mix of subjects such as economics, history, dispute resolution, business and management), generic skills, specific legal skills, ethics and values. More recently, some commentators have argued that the curriculum should be ‘internationalised’ in order to prepare students for increasingly ‘globalised’ legal practice. According to some of these commentators, there is no question but that we should internationalise the curriculum, and the real issue now is how we should go about doing it. In as much as these commentators suggest that there is a pressing need for curricula reform to accommodate external drivers such as globalisation, they may be correct. But if they are suggesting that all law schools and all law teachers are on board with the need for change, then they are being overly optimistic. The debate about internationalisation of the curriculum is far from over. Curriculum reform (or the more trendy term – ‘curriculum renewal’) is a painful process and one that faces many challenges including ‘turf wars’, ‘the demon of coverage’, the curriculum design equivalent of the Not in My Back Yard syndrome (NIMBY), and a university environment in which academic freedom is highly valued.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law
EditorsW van Caenegem, M Hiscock
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter4
Pages70-91
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9781783474547
ISBN (Print)9781783474530
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2014

Fingerprint

internationalization
curriculum
education
reform
legal usage
Law
philosophy
school law
coverage
driver
moral philosophy
globalization
university
Teaching
teacher
history
management
economics
Values

Cite this

Wolski, B. (2014). Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration. In W. van Caenegem, & M. Hiscock (Eds.), The Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law (pp. 70-91). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474547.00013
Wolski, Bobette. / Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration. The Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law. editor / W van Caenegem ; M Hiscock. United Kingdom : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. pp. 70-91
@inbook{bc847329e60641a2a0693fb6a8ecc766,
title = "Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration",
abstract = "ExtractThe legitimate goals of legal education, and the demands made on an already crowded curriculum, are overwhelming. Commentators and policymakers point to the importance of teaching ‘core knowledge’, law in context (with an interdisciplinary mix of subjects such as economics, history, dispute resolution, business and management), generic skills, specific legal skills, ethics and values. More recently, some commentators have argued that the curriculum should be ‘internationalised’ in order to prepare students for increasingly ‘globalised’ legal practice. According to some of these commentators, there is no question but that we should internationalise the curriculum, and the real issue now is how we should go about doing it. In as much as these commentators suggest that there is a pressing need for curricula reform to accommodate external drivers such as globalisation, they may be correct. But if they are suggesting that all law schools and all law teachers are on board with the need for change, then they are being overly optimistic. The debate about internationalisation of the curriculum is far from over. Curriculum reform (or the more trendy term – ‘curriculum renewal’) is a painful process and one that faces many challenges including ‘turf wars’, ‘the demon of coverage’, the curriculum design equivalent of the Not in My Back Yard syndrome (NIMBY), and a university environment in which academic freedom is highly valued.",
author = "Bobette Wolski",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.4337/9781783474547.00013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781783474530",
pages = "70--91",
editor = "{van Caenegem}, {W } and M Hiscock",
booktitle = "The Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Wolski, B 2014, Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration. in W van Caenegem & M Hiscock (eds), The Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, United Kingdom, pp. 70-91. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474547.00013

Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration. / Wolski, Bobette.

The Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law. ed. / W van Caenegem; M Hiscock. United Kingdom : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. p. 70-91.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration

AU - Wolski, Bobette

PY - 2014/8/29

Y1 - 2014/8/29

N2 - ExtractThe legitimate goals of legal education, and the demands made on an already crowded curriculum, are overwhelming. Commentators and policymakers point to the importance of teaching ‘core knowledge’, law in context (with an interdisciplinary mix of subjects such as economics, history, dispute resolution, business and management), generic skills, specific legal skills, ethics and values. More recently, some commentators have argued that the curriculum should be ‘internationalised’ in order to prepare students for increasingly ‘globalised’ legal practice. According to some of these commentators, there is no question but that we should internationalise the curriculum, and the real issue now is how we should go about doing it. In as much as these commentators suggest that there is a pressing need for curricula reform to accommodate external drivers such as globalisation, they may be correct. But if they are suggesting that all law schools and all law teachers are on board with the need for change, then they are being overly optimistic. The debate about internationalisation of the curriculum is far from over. Curriculum reform (or the more trendy term – ‘curriculum renewal’) is a painful process and one that faces many challenges including ‘turf wars’, ‘the demon of coverage’, the curriculum design equivalent of the Not in My Back Yard syndrome (NIMBY), and a university environment in which academic freedom is highly valued.

AB - ExtractThe legitimate goals of legal education, and the demands made on an already crowded curriculum, are overwhelming. Commentators and policymakers point to the importance of teaching ‘core knowledge’, law in context (with an interdisciplinary mix of subjects such as economics, history, dispute resolution, business and management), generic skills, specific legal skills, ethics and values. More recently, some commentators have argued that the curriculum should be ‘internationalised’ in order to prepare students for increasingly ‘globalised’ legal practice. According to some of these commentators, there is no question but that we should internationalise the curriculum, and the real issue now is how we should go about doing it. In as much as these commentators suggest that there is a pressing need for curricula reform to accommodate external drivers such as globalisation, they may be correct. But if they are suggesting that all law schools and all law teachers are on board with the need for change, then they are being overly optimistic. The debate about internationalisation of the curriculum is far from over. Curriculum reform (or the more trendy term – ‘curriculum renewal’) is a painful process and one that faces many challenges including ‘turf wars’, ‘the demon of coverage’, the curriculum design equivalent of the Not in My Back Yard syndrome (NIMBY), and a university environment in which academic freedom is highly valued.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958688734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4337/9781783474547.00013

DO - 10.4337/9781783474547.00013

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781783474530

SP - 70

EP - 91

BT - The Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law

A2 - van Caenegem, W

A2 - Hiscock, M

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

CY - United Kingdom

ER -

Wolski B. Continuing the internationalisation debate: Philosophies of legal education, issues in curriculum design and lessons from skills integration. In van Caenegem W, Hiscock M, editors, The Internationalisation of Legal Education: The Future Practice of Law. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2014. p. 70-91 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474547.00013