Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constitutionally Heeding the Right to Silence in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Statutes are increasingly infringing the right to silence, effectively forcing a person accused of wrongdoing to answer questions by authorities, upon pain of penalty (or adverse inference). This article demonstrates that the right to silence has long characterised common law systems of justice, and is connected with the presumption of innocence. It is fundamental that it is the person accusing another of wrongdoing to prove their claims, without being able to force the accused to assist. This is increasingly at risk. The High Court should afford greater protection to the time-honoured tradition through Chapter III of the Australian Constitution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-187
Number of pages32
JournalMonash University Law Review
Volume39
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Court cases

Title CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION v GROCON CONSTRUCTORS (VICTORIA) PTY LTD and Others (2014)
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date of judgement24/10/14
Case number(2014) 47 VR 527
TitleBackus & Abano (No. 4) BC202504530
CourtFederal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Date of judgement28/01/25
Case number[2025] FedCFAmC1F 30

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutionally Heeding the Right to Silence in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this