Considering the public private-dichotomy: Hannah Arendt, Václav Havel and Victor Klemperer on the importance of the private

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines the political significance of discursive activity in the private sphere in the thought of Hannah Arendt, Václav Havel, and Victor Klemperer. Against criticisms of Arendt which claim that she pays too much attention to the public sphere and consequently misses the importance of the private sphere in her analysis of political action, this paper highlights important insights in Arendt’s writing on family and friendship and the ability of these relationships to act as havens where discourse can thrive. What emerges from the analysis is a rich agonistic discourse ethics. The paper employs the respective thought of Havel and Klemperer to highlight Arendt’s work on the political significance of private virtues for promoting an awareness of responsibility. This position is then defended against the criticisms of discourse ethics offered by Chantal Mouffe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-265
Number of pages17
JournalHuman Studies
Volume40
Issue number2
Early online date20 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

discourse
criticism
moral philosophy
political action
friendship
responsibility
ability
Discourse Ethics
Criticism
Hannah Arendt
Public-private
Private Sphere
Thought
Dichotomy
Political Action
Chantal Mouffe
Responsibility
Public Sphere
Discursive
Discourse

Cite this

@article{70ade3dbf04a4c73aab5ce1d334051f5,
title = "Considering the public private-dichotomy: Hannah Arendt, V{\'a}clav Havel and Victor Klemperer on the importance of the private",
abstract = "This paper examines the political significance of discursive activity in the private sphere in the thought of Hannah Arendt, V{\'a}clav Havel, and Victor Klemperer. Against criticisms of Arendt which claim that she pays too much attention to the public sphere and consequently misses the importance of the private sphere in her analysis of political action, this paper highlights important insights in Arendt’s writing on family and friendship and the ability of these relationships to act as havens where discourse can thrive. What emerges from the analysis is a rich agonistic discourse ethics. The paper employs the respective thought of Havel and Klemperer to highlight Arendt’s work on the political significance of private virtues for promoting an awareness of responsibility. This position is then defended against the criticisms of discourse ethics offered by Chantal Mouffe.",
author = "Daniel Brennan",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10746-017-9424-x",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "249--265",
journal = "Human Studies",
issn = "0163-8548",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

Considering the public private-dichotomy : Hannah Arendt, Václav Havel and Victor Klemperer on the importance of the private. / Brennan, Daniel.

In: Human Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, 06.2017, p. 249-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering the public private-dichotomy

T2 - Hannah Arendt, Václav Havel and Victor Klemperer on the importance of the private

AU - Brennan, Daniel

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - This paper examines the political significance of discursive activity in the private sphere in the thought of Hannah Arendt, Václav Havel, and Victor Klemperer. Against criticisms of Arendt which claim that she pays too much attention to the public sphere and consequently misses the importance of the private sphere in her analysis of political action, this paper highlights important insights in Arendt’s writing on family and friendship and the ability of these relationships to act as havens where discourse can thrive. What emerges from the analysis is a rich agonistic discourse ethics. The paper employs the respective thought of Havel and Klemperer to highlight Arendt’s work on the political significance of private virtues for promoting an awareness of responsibility. This position is then defended against the criticisms of discourse ethics offered by Chantal Mouffe.

AB - This paper examines the political significance of discursive activity in the private sphere in the thought of Hannah Arendt, Václav Havel, and Victor Klemperer. Against criticisms of Arendt which claim that she pays too much attention to the public sphere and consequently misses the importance of the private sphere in her analysis of political action, this paper highlights important insights in Arendt’s writing on family and friendship and the ability of these relationships to act as havens where discourse can thrive. What emerges from the analysis is a rich agonistic discourse ethics. The paper employs the respective thought of Havel and Klemperer to highlight Arendt’s work on the political significance of private virtues for promoting an awareness of responsibility. This position is then defended against the criticisms of discourse ethics offered by Chantal Mouffe.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015678391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10746-017-9424-x

DO - 10.1007/s10746-017-9424-x

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 249

EP - 265

JO - Human Studies

JF - Human Studies

SN - 0163-8548

IS - 2

ER -