Abstract
In September 2001 a new set of guidelines were presented by the Privacy Commissioner, containing fewer — not to say a lack of — explanations in relation to the use of the ambiguous term ‘consent’.
This article aims to examinine the differences, in relation to the term ‘consent’, between the September guidelines and the ones released only four months earlier.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 112-113 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Privacy Law and Policy Reporter |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Consent : How much can the meaning of a word change in four months? / Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.
In: Privacy Law and Policy Reporter, Vol. 8, No. 6, 2001, p. 112-113.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research
TY - JOUR
T1 - Consent
T2 - How much can the meaning of a word change in four months?
AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - In May 2001 the Privacy Commissioner released a set of guidelines to assist the interpretation of the private sector amendments made to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), which came into force on the 21 December 2001. Among other things, those guidelines contained a detailed discussion on the meaning of the term ‘consent’.In September 2001 a new set of guidelines were presented by the Privacy Commissioner, containing fewer — not to say a lack of — explanations in relation to the use of the ambiguous term ‘consent’.This article aims to examinine the differences, in relation to the term ‘consent’, between the September guidelines and the ones released only four months earlier.
AB - In May 2001 the Privacy Commissioner released a set of guidelines to assist the interpretation of the private sector amendments made to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), which came into force on the 21 December 2001. Among other things, those guidelines contained a detailed discussion on the meaning of the term ‘consent’.In September 2001 a new set of guidelines were presented by the Privacy Commissioner, containing fewer — not to say a lack of — explanations in relation to the use of the ambiguous term ‘consent’.This article aims to examinine the differences, in relation to the term ‘consent’, between the September guidelines and the ones released only four months earlier.
M3 - Article
VL - 8
SP - 112
EP - 113
JO - Privacy Law and Policy Reporter
JF - Privacy Law and Policy Reporter
SN - 1321-3563
IS - 6
ER -