Connecting simulation and quality improvement: How can healthcare simulation really improve patient care?

Victoria Brazil, Eve Isabelle Purdy, Komal Bajaj

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

Abstract

[Extract]
Simulation has an established role in the education and training of healthcare professionals, but its function as a healthcare quality improvement (QI) tool is more emergent. In this edition of the journal, Ajmi and colleagues report on a simulation-based intervention that improved door-to-needle times and patient outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke. This prompts reflection on the positioning of simulation-based methods within QI programmes, the role of trained simulation experts as part of QI-focused teams and the directions for future scholarly enquiry that supports integration of these fields.

The improvement report by Ajmi et al is a comprehensive and thoughtful example among many reports of simulation-based interventions to improve care processes and patient outcomes. Improved time-based targets in trauma, stroke and cardiac care are frequently cited in the literature, as are better resuscitation outcomes and compliance with practice guidelines. The identification of latent safety threats in clinical environments, including testing of new facilities prior to opening, is also well described. Such research is usually positioned as providing ‘proof’ that simulation ‘works’ for improving patient care. However, confounders and balancing measures may not be rigorously examined in this enthusiasm to demonstrate cause and effect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)862-865
Number of pages4
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume28
Issue number11
Early online date18 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Patient Care
Delivery of Health Care
Stroke
Practice Guidelines
Resuscitation
Needles
Safety
Education
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Cite this

Brazil, Victoria ; Purdy, Eve Isabelle ; Bajaj, Komal. / Connecting simulation and quality improvement : How can healthcare simulation really improve patient care?. In: BMJ Quality and Safety. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 862-865.
@article{8235c6d403594cc9a77f54563d9346d4,
title = "Connecting simulation and quality improvement: How can healthcare simulation really improve patient care?",
abstract = "[Extract] Simulation has an established role in the education and training of healthcare professionals, but its function as a healthcare quality improvement (QI) tool is more emergent. In this edition of the journal, Ajmi and colleagues report on a simulation-based intervention that improved door-to-needle times and patient outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke. This prompts reflection on the positioning of simulation-based methods within QI programmes, the role of trained simulation experts as part of QI-focused teams and the directions for future scholarly enquiry that supports integration of these fields.The improvement report by Ajmi et al is a comprehensive and thoughtful example among many reports of simulation-based interventions to improve care processes and patient outcomes. Improved time-based targets in trauma, stroke and cardiac care are frequently cited in the literature, as are better resuscitation outcomes and compliance with practice guidelines. The identification of latent safety threats in clinical environments, including testing of new facilities prior to opening, is also well described. Such research is usually positioned as providing ‘proof’ that simulation ‘works’ for improving patient care. However, confounders and balancing measures may not be rigorously examined in this enthusiasm to demonstrate cause and effect.",
author = "Victoria Brazil and Purdy, {Eve Isabelle} and Komal Bajaj",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009767",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "862--865",
journal = "Quality and Safety in Health Care",
issn = "1475-3898",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

Connecting simulation and quality improvement : How can healthcare simulation really improve patient care? / Brazil, Victoria; Purdy, Eve Isabelle; Bajaj, Komal.

In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 28, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 862-865.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Connecting simulation and quality improvement

T2 - How can healthcare simulation really improve patient care?

AU - Brazil, Victoria

AU - Purdy, Eve Isabelle

AU - Bajaj, Komal

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - [Extract] Simulation has an established role in the education and training of healthcare professionals, but its function as a healthcare quality improvement (QI) tool is more emergent. In this edition of the journal, Ajmi and colleagues report on a simulation-based intervention that improved door-to-needle times and patient outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke. This prompts reflection on the positioning of simulation-based methods within QI programmes, the role of trained simulation experts as part of QI-focused teams and the directions for future scholarly enquiry that supports integration of these fields.The improvement report by Ajmi et al is a comprehensive and thoughtful example among many reports of simulation-based interventions to improve care processes and patient outcomes. Improved time-based targets in trauma, stroke and cardiac care are frequently cited in the literature, as are better resuscitation outcomes and compliance with practice guidelines. The identification of latent safety threats in clinical environments, including testing of new facilities prior to opening, is also well described. Such research is usually positioned as providing ‘proof’ that simulation ‘works’ for improving patient care. However, confounders and balancing measures may not be rigorously examined in this enthusiasm to demonstrate cause and effect.

AB - [Extract] Simulation has an established role in the education and training of healthcare professionals, but its function as a healthcare quality improvement (QI) tool is more emergent. In this edition of the journal, Ajmi and colleagues report on a simulation-based intervention that improved door-to-needle times and patient outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke. This prompts reflection on the positioning of simulation-based methods within QI programmes, the role of trained simulation experts as part of QI-focused teams and the directions for future scholarly enquiry that supports integration of these fields.The improvement report by Ajmi et al is a comprehensive and thoughtful example among many reports of simulation-based interventions to improve care processes and patient outcomes. Improved time-based targets in trauma, stroke and cardiac care are frequently cited in the literature, as are better resuscitation outcomes and compliance with practice guidelines. The identification of latent safety threats in clinical environments, including testing of new facilities prior to opening, is also well described. Such research is usually positioned as providing ‘proof’ that simulation ‘works’ for improving patient care. However, confounders and balancing measures may not be rigorously examined in this enthusiasm to demonstrate cause and effect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069499913&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009767

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009767

M3 - Editorial

VL - 28

SP - 862

EP - 865

JO - Quality and Safety in Health Care

JF - Quality and Safety in Health Care

SN - 1475-3898

IS - 11

ER -