Abstract
This commentary engages with the recently introduced category of business war volunteer tourism through dialogue with those enacting it. Drawing on exploratory interviews with eleven practitioners travelling to Ukraine since 2022, five Ukrainian organizational partners, and one government tourism official, we identify three disconnects between scholarship and practice: a definitional gap, in which practitioners resist the “tourist” label; a motivational gap, in which their “whys” remain untheorized; and a procedural gap, in which the category has been built without practitioner voices. We propose reimagining the category in terms participants accept and co-developing it through humble, sustained partnership. With over 120 active armed conflicts globally, building such categories alongside those enacting and receiving them is both a scholarly and moral obligation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 104231 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-5 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Annals of Tourism Research |
| Volume | 119 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Connecting business war volunteer tourism scholarship and practice: Critical insights from practitioners in Ukraine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver