Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Extract
At the beginning of our discussion, we asked whether the BRICS is a loosely formed intergovernmental network or a powerful economic bloc that can effect paradigmatic changes in the world economy, or is it merely a pressure group that can raise awareness of the imperfections in an unbalanced and dysfunctional global political economy? There is no doubt that the BRICS is presently a platform for international cooperation and dialogue with a rich and ambitious agenda, but will it or can it go further? The BRICS has been greeted with hyperbole, but it already has a history of being unable to deal with real issues, and of not asserting a group interest at the expense of national interest. The failure to support a developing country candidate for the leadership of the IMF, where there was a genuine contest between qualified nominees, is one instance. A further example is the lack of support by Russia and China for Brazil and India to become permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. Coordination is difficult when the BRICS members have critical differences in culture, patterns of development, economic and social systems and stages of economic maturity. To move further as a force for change, the BRICS needs more structure, tighter cooperation and a single strong voice, but it is unlikely to have an alliance based on military or strategic security concerns.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms?
EditorsV l Lo, M Hiscock
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter18
Pages308-312
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781782545477
ISBN (Print)9781782545460
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

need structure
group interest
pressure group
international cooperation
IMF
world economy
economic system
social system
maturity
economics
political economy
UNO
Russia
Brazil
candidacy
dialogue
Military
developing country
leadership
India

Cite this

Hiscock, M., & Lo, V. I. (2014). Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau? In V. L. Lo, & M. Hiscock (Eds.), The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms? (pp. 308-312). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545477.00025
Hiscock, Mary ; Lo, Vai Io. / Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau?. The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms?. editor / V l Lo ; M Hiscock. United Kingdom : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. pp. 308-312
@inbook{b9cef37d3be24a2c9dabebae5a35e2fa,
title = "Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau?",
abstract = "ExtractAt the beginning of our discussion, we asked whether the BRICS is a loosely formed intergovernmental network or a powerful economic bloc that can effect paradigmatic changes in the world economy, or is it merely a pressure group that can raise awareness of the imperfections in an unbalanced and dysfunctional global political economy? There is no doubt that the BRICS is presently a platform for international cooperation and dialogue with a rich and ambitious agenda, but will it or can it go further? The BRICS has been greeted with hyperbole, but it already has a history of being unable to deal with real issues, and of not asserting a group interest at the expense of national interest. The failure to support a developing country candidate for the leadership of the IMF, where there was a genuine contest between qualified nominees, is one instance. A further example is the lack of support by Russia and China for Brazil and India to become permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. Coordination is difficult when the BRICS members have critical differences in culture, patterns of development, economic and social systems and stages of economic maturity. To move further as a force for change, the BRICS needs more structure, tighter cooperation and a single strong voice, but it is unlikely to have an alliance based on military or strategic security concerns.",
author = "Mary Hiscock and Lo, {Vai Io}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.4337/9781782545477.00025",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781782545460",
pages = "308--312",
editor = "Lo, {V l} and M Hiscock",
booktitle = "The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms?",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Hiscock, M & Lo, VI 2014, Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau? in VL Lo & M Hiscock (eds), The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms?. Edward Elgar Publishing, United Kingdom, pp. 308-312. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545477.00025

Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau? / Hiscock, Mary; Lo, Vai Io.

The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms?. ed. / V l Lo; M Hiscock. United Kingdom : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. p. 308-312.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau?

AU - Hiscock, Mary

AU - Lo, Vai Io

PY - 2014/1/31

Y1 - 2014/1/31

N2 - ExtractAt the beginning of our discussion, we asked whether the BRICS is a loosely formed intergovernmental network or a powerful economic bloc that can effect paradigmatic changes in the world economy, or is it merely a pressure group that can raise awareness of the imperfections in an unbalanced and dysfunctional global political economy? There is no doubt that the BRICS is presently a platform for international cooperation and dialogue with a rich and ambitious agenda, but will it or can it go further? The BRICS has been greeted with hyperbole, but it already has a history of being unable to deal with real issues, and of not asserting a group interest at the expense of national interest. The failure to support a developing country candidate for the leadership of the IMF, where there was a genuine contest between qualified nominees, is one instance. A further example is the lack of support by Russia and China for Brazil and India to become permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. Coordination is difficult when the BRICS members have critical differences in culture, patterns of development, economic and social systems and stages of economic maturity. To move further as a force for change, the BRICS needs more structure, tighter cooperation and a single strong voice, but it is unlikely to have an alliance based on military or strategic security concerns.

AB - ExtractAt the beginning of our discussion, we asked whether the BRICS is a loosely formed intergovernmental network or a powerful economic bloc that can effect paradigmatic changes in the world economy, or is it merely a pressure group that can raise awareness of the imperfections in an unbalanced and dysfunctional global political economy? There is no doubt that the BRICS is presently a platform for international cooperation and dialogue with a rich and ambitious agenda, but will it or can it go further? The BRICS has been greeted with hyperbole, but it already has a history of being unable to deal with real issues, and of not asserting a group interest at the expense of national interest. The failure to support a developing country candidate for the leadership of the IMF, where there was a genuine contest between qualified nominees, is one instance. A further example is the lack of support by Russia and China for Brazil and India to become permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. Coordination is difficult when the BRICS members have critical differences in culture, patterns of development, economic and social systems and stages of economic maturity. To move further as a force for change, the BRICS needs more structure, tighter cooperation and a single strong voice, but it is unlikely to have an alliance based on military or strategic security concerns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958105312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4337/9781782545477.00025

DO - 10.4337/9781782545477.00025

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781782545460

SP - 308

EP - 312

BT - The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms?

A2 - Lo, V l

A2 - Hiscock, M

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

CY - United Kingdom

ER -

Hiscock M, Lo VI. Conclusions: The BRICS - ascendancy, decline or plateau? In Lo VL, Hiscock M, editors, The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms?. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2014. p. 308-312 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545477.00025