Computerisation in Australian general practice

Mark C Western, Kathryn M Dwan, John S Western, Toni Makkai, Chris Del Mar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM: To assess the current levels of computer use in Australian general practice, and identify clinical and administrative tasks for which computers are most commonly used by general practitioners.

METHODS: A telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of Australian GPs in active practice (n = 1202).

RESULTS: The national response rate was 55.5%, with New South Wales, Tasmania and the Australian Capitol Territory recording lower than national rates, and Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory recording higher rates. Australian general practices were highly computerised (86%). General practitioners practising in capital cities were less likely to be computerised than their rural colleagues (p < .001). There were no significant differences in general computerisation among practices in the Australian states and territories (p > .05). Three task sets for which computers were used were identified: general administrative functions, patient oriented administrative functions and clinical functions. Computers were more likely to be used for administrative than clinical tasks. Use for administrative tasks increased with the size of the practice (p < .001) and with years of computer use (p < .001).

DISCUSSION: The results suggest that within two years 95% of Australian general practices will be computerised. While use of computers for clinical functions is less common than for administrative purposes, electronic script writing packages are widely employed. However, other theoretically valuable functions for improving clinical outcomes for patients, such as patient educational material and decision support systems, are the least commonly used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-5
Number of pages6
JournalAustralian Family Physician
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

General Practice
General Practitioners
Northern Territory
Tasmania
Western Australia
New South Wales
Queensland
Telephone

Cite this

Western, M. C., Dwan, K. M., Western, J. S., Makkai, T., & Del Mar, C. (2003). Computerisation in Australian general practice. Australian Family Physician, 32(3), 180-5.
Western, Mark C ; Dwan, Kathryn M ; Western, John S ; Makkai, Toni ; Del Mar, Chris. / Computerisation in Australian general practice. In: Australian Family Physician. 2003 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 180-5.
@article{d52dafc2d31e4d2b8d36ec1a666076e8,
title = "Computerisation in Australian general practice",
abstract = "AIM: To assess the current levels of computer use in Australian general practice, and identify clinical and administrative tasks for which computers are most commonly used by general practitioners.METHODS: A telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of Australian GPs in active practice (n = 1202).RESULTS: The national response rate was 55.5{\%}, with New South Wales, Tasmania and the Australian Capitol Territory recording lower than national rates, and Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory recording higher rates. Australian general practices were highly computerised (86{\%}). General practitioners practising in capital cities were less likely to be computerised than their rural colleagues (p < .001). There were no significant differences in general computerisation among practices in the Australian states and territories (p > .05). Three task sets for which computers were used were identified: general administrative functions, patient oriented administrative functions and clinical functions. Computers were more likely to be used for administrative than clinical tasks. Use for administrative tasks increased with the size of the practice (p < .001) and with years of computer use (p < .001).DISCUSSION: The results suggest that within two years 95{\%} of Australian general practices will be computerised. While use of computers for clinical functions is less common than for administrative purposes, electronic script writing packages are widely employed. However, other theoretically valuable functions for improving clinical outcomes for patients, such as patient educational material and decision support systems, are the least commonly used.",
author = "Western, {Mark C} and Dwan, {Kathryn M} and Western, {John S} and Toni Makkai and {Del Mar}, Chris",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "180--5",
journal = "Australian Family Physician",
issn = "0300-8495",
publisher = "Royal Australian College of General Practitioners",
number = "3",

}

Western, MC, Dwan, KM, Western, JS, Makkai, T & Del Mar, C 2003, 'Computerisation in Australian general practice' Australian Family Physician, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 180-5.

Computerisation in Australian general practice. / Western, Mark C; Dwan, Kathryn M; Western, John S; Makkai, Toni; Del Mar, Chris.

In: Australian Family Physician, Vol. 32, No. 3, 03.2003, p. 180-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerisation in Australian general practice

AU - Western, Mark C

AU - Dwan, Kathryn M

AU - Western, John S

AU - Makkai, Toni

AU - Del Mar, Chris

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - AIM: To assess the current levels of computer use in Australian general practice, and identify clinical and administrative tasks for which computers are most commonly used by general practitioners.METHODS: A telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of Australian GPs in active practice (n = 1202).RESULTS: The national response rate was 55.5%, with New South Wales, Tasmania and the Australian Capitol Territory recording lower than national rates, and Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory recording higher rates. Australian general practices were highly computerised (86%). General practitioners practising in capital cities were less likely to be computerised than their rural colleagues (p < .001). There were no significant differences in general computerisation among practices in the Australian states and territories (p > .05). Three task sets for which computers were used were identified: general administrative functions, patient oriented administrative functions and clinical functions. Computers were more likely to be used for administrative than clinical tasks. Use for administrative tasks increased with the size of the practice (p < .001) and with years of computer use (p < .001).DISCUSSION: The results suggest that within two years 95% of Australian general practices will be computerised. While use of computers for clinical functions is less common than for administrative purposes, electronic script writing packages are widely employed. However, other theoretically valuable functions for improving clinical outcomes for patients, such as patient educational material and decision support systems, are the least commonly used.

AB - AIM: To assess the current levels of computer use in Australian general practice, and identify clinical and administrative tasks for which computers are most commonly used by general practitioners.METHODS: A telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of Australian GPs in active practice (n = 1202).RESULTS: The national response rate was 55.5%, with New South Wales, Tasmania and the Australian Capitol Territory recording lower than national rates, and Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory recording higher rates. Australian general practices were highly computerised (86%). General practitioners practising in capital cities were less likely to be computerised than their rural colleagues (p < .001). There were no significant differences in general computerisation among practices in the Australian states and territories (p > .05). Three task sets for which computers were used were identified: general administrative functions, patient oriented administrative functions and clinical functions. Computers were more likely to be used for administrative than clinical tasks. Use for administrative tasks increased with the size of the practice (p < .001) and with years of computer use (p < .001).DISCUSSION: The results suggest that within two years 95% of Australian general practices will be computerised. While use of computers for clinical functions is less common than for administrative purposes, electronic script writing packages are widely employed. However, other theoretically valuable functions for improving clinical outcomes for patients, such as patient educational material and decision support systems, are the least commonly used.

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 180

EP - 185

JO - Australian Family Physician

JF - Australian Family Physician

SN - 0300-8495

IS - 3

ER -

Western MC, Dwan KM, Western JS, Makkai T, Del Mar C. Computerisation in Australian general practice. Australian Family Physician. 2003 Mar;32(3):180-5.