Competency-based assessment tools for regional anaesthesia: a narrative review

A. Chuan, A. S. Wan, C. F. Royse, K. Forrest

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Competency-based assessment tools are used in regional anaesthesia to measure the performance of study participants, trainees, and consultants. This narrative review was performed to appraise currently published assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. A literature search found 397 citations of which 28 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria of primary psychometric evaluation of assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. The included studies were diverse in the type of assessment and the skill set being assessed. The types of assessments included multiple-choice questions, hand-motion analysis, cumulative sum, visuospatial and psychomotor screening, checklists, and global rating scales. The skill sets that were assessed included holistic regional anaesthesia technical and non-technical performance observed at the bedside, to isolated part-tasks, such as needle tip visualisation under ultrasound. To evaluate validity and reliability, we compared the studies against published medical education consensus statements on ideal assessment tools. We discuss the relative merits of different tools when used to assess regional anaesthesia, the importance of psychometrically robust assessment tools in competency-based anaesthesia education, and directions for future education research in regional anaesthesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-273
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume120
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Conduction Anesthesia
Competency-Based Education
Consultants
Medical Education
Checklist
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Needles
Consensus
Anesthesia
Hand
Education
Research

Cite this

Chuan, A. ; Wan, A. S. ; Royse, C. F. ; Forrest, K. / Competency-based assessment tools for regional anaesthesia : a narrative review. In: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018 ; Vol. 120, No. 2. pp. 264-273.
@article{2b8b40061d1b42f9bb52b84f2d2ec51d,
title = "Competency-based assessment tools for regional anaesthesia: a narrative review",
abstract = "Competency-based assessment tools are used in regional anaesthesia to measure the performance of study participants, trainees, and consultants. This narrative review was performed to appraise currently published assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. A literature search found 397 citations of which 28 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria of primary psychometric evaluation of assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. The included studies were diverse in the type of assessment and the skill set being assessed. The types of assessments included multiple-choice questions, hand-motion analysis, cumulative sum, visuospatial and psychomotor screening, checklists, and global rating scales. The skill sets that were assessed included holistic regional anaesthesia technical and non-technical performance observed at the bedside, to isolated part-tasks, such as needle tip visualisation under ultrasound. To evaluate validity and reliability, we compared the studies against published medical education consensus statements on ideal assessment tools. We discuss the relative merits of different tools when used to assess regional anaesthesia, the importance of psychometrically robust assessment tools in competency-based anaesthesia education, and directions for future education research in regional anaesthesia.",
author = "A. Chuan and Wan, {A. S.} and Royse, {C. F.} and K. Forrest",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bja.2017.09.007",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "264--273",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Competency-based assessment tools for regional anaesthesia : a narrative review. / Chuan, A.; Wan, A. S.; Royse, C. F.; Forrest, K.

In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 120, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 264-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competency-based assessment tools for regional anaesthesia

T2 - a narrative review

AU - Chuan, A.

AU - Wan, A. S.

AU - Royse, C. F.

AU - Forrest, K.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Competency-based assessment tools are used in regional anaesthesia to measure the performance of study participants, trainees, and consultants. This narrative review was performed to appraise currently published assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. A literature search found 397 citations of which 28 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria of primary psychometric evaluation of assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. The included studies were diverse in the type of assessment and the skill set being assessed. The types of assessments included multiple-choice questions, hand-motion analysis, cumulative sum, visuospatial and psychomotor screening, checklists, and global rating scales. The skill sets that were assessed included holistic regional anaesthesia technical and non-technical performance observed at the bedside, to isolated part-tasks, such as needle tip visualisation under ultrasound. To evaluate validity and reliability, we compared the studies against published medical education consensus statements on ideal assessment tools. We discuss the relative merits of different tools when used to assess regional anaesthesia, the importance of psychometrically robust assessment tools in competency-based anaesthesia education, and directions for future education research in regional anaesthesia.

AB - Competency-based assessment tools are used in regional anaesthesia to measure the performance of study participants, trainees, and consultants. This narrative review was performed to appraise currently published assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. A literature search found 397 citations of which 28 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria of primary psychometric evaluation of assessment tools for regional anaesthesia. The included studies were diverse in the type of assessment and the skill set being assessed. The types of assessments included multiple-choice questions, hand-motion analysis, cumulative sum, visuospatial and psychomotor screening, checklists, and global rating scales. The skill sets that were assessed included holistic regional anaesthesia technical and non-technical performance observed at the bedside, to isolated part-tasks, such as needle tip visualisation under ultrasound. To evaluate validity and reliability, we compared the studies against published medical education consensus statements on ideal assessment tools. We discuss the relative merits of different tools when used to assess regional anaesthesia, the importance of psychometrically robust assessment tools in competency-based anaesthesia education, and directions for future education research in regional anaesthesia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053410411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2017.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2017.09.007

M3 - Review article

VL - 120

SP - 264

EP - 273

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 2

ER -