TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of sustainable community rating tools in Australia
AU - Xia, Bo
AU - Chen, Qing
AU - Skitmore, Martin
AU - Zuo, Jian
AU - Li, Mei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/12/16
Y1 - 2015/12/16
N2 - The community is the basic unit of urban development, and appropriate assessment tools are needed for communities to evaluate and facilitate decision making concerning sustainable community development and reduce the detrimental effects of urban community actions on the environment. Existing research into sustainable community rating tools focuses primarily on those that are internationally recognized to describe their advantages and future challenges. However, the differences between rating tools due to different regional conditions, situations and characteristics have yet to be addressed. In doing this, this paper examines three sustainable community rating tools in Australia, namely Green Star-Communities PILOT, EnviroDevelopment and VicUrban Sustainability Charter (Master Planned Community Assessment Tool). In order to identify their similarities, differences and advantages these are compared in terms of sustainability coverage, prerequisites, adaptation to locality, scoring and weighting, participation, presentation of results, and application process. These results provide the stakeholders of sustainable community development projects with a better understanding of the available rating tools in Australia and assist with evaluation and decision making.
AB - The community is the basic unit of urban development, and appropriate assessment tools are needed for communities to evaluate and facilitate decision making concerning sustainable community development and reduce the detrimental effects of urban community actions on the environment. Existing research into sustainable community rating tools focuses primarily on those that are internationally recognized to describe their advantages and future challenges. However, the differences between rating tools due to different regional conditions, situations and characteristics have yet to be addressed. In doing this, this paper examines three sustainable community rating tools in Australia, namely Green Star-Communities PILOT, EnviroDevelopment and VicUrban Sustainability Charter (Master Planned Community Assessment Tool). In order to identify their similarities, differences and advantages these are compared in terms of sustainability coverage, prerequisites, adaptation to locality, scoring and weighting, participation, presentation of results, and application process. These results provide the stakeholders of sustainable community development projects with a better understanding of the available rating tools in Australia and assist with evaluation and decision making.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940676096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84940676096
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 109
SP - 84
EP - 91
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -