Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of NanoBone® and BioOss® for human osteoblasts

Qin Liu, Timothy Douglas, Christiane Zamponi, Stephan T. Becker, Eugene Sherry, Sureshan Sivananthan, Frauke Warnke, Jörg Wiltfang, Patrick H. Warnke*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)


Introduction: Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering seeded with the patient's own cells might be used as a preferable method to repair bone defects in the future. With the emerging new technologies of nanostructure design, new synthetic biomaterials are appearing on the market. Such scaffolds must be tested in vitro for their biocompatibility before clinical application. However, the choice between a natural or a synthetic biomaterial might be challenging for the doctor and the patient. In this study, we compared the biocompatibility of a synthetic bone substitute, NanoBone ®, to the widely used natural bovine bone replacement material BioOss ®. Material and methods: The in vitro behaviour of human osteoblasts on both materials was investigated. Cell performance was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cell vitality staining and four biocompatibility tests (LDH, MTT, WST, BrdU). Results: We found that both materials showed low cytotoxicity and good biocompatibility. The MTT proliferation test was superior for Nanobone ®. Discussion: Both scaffolds caused only little damage to human osteoblasts and justify their clinical application. However, NanoBone ® was able to support and promote proliferation of human osteoblasts slightly better than BioOss ® in our chosen test set-up. The results may guide doctors and patients when being challenged with the choice between a natural or a synthetic biomaterial. Further experiments are necessary to determine the comparison of biocompatibility in vivo.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1259-1264
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility of NanoBone® and BioOss® for human osteoblasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this