Comparative controlled trial of low-dose weekly methotrexate versus azathioprine in rheumatoid arthritis: 3-year prospective study

M. H. Arnold, J. O'callaghan, M. Mccredie, E. M. Beller, D. E. Kelly, P. M. Brooks*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: Fifty-three patients with rheumatoid arthritis who required immunosuppressive therapy were commenced in a randomized trial comparing azathioprine to weekly oral pulse ethotrexate. After an initial 24-week period, both groups had significantly improved from baseline measures of pain and functional capacity and there were no significant ifferences in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Laboratory variables of disease activity showed a significant improvement in haemoglobin and ESR in the methotrexate group. Subsequently, the patients were followed for up to 3 years. After one year, more than half of the patients in both groups had discontinued therapy due to inefficacy or adverse events. Adverse effects were more frequent in the patients treated with ethotrexate, but withdrawal rates were similar in both groups. From these data, the probability of a patient continuing therapy with either agent for reater than 18 months is low.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-125
Number of pages6
JournalRheumatology
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative controlled trial of low-dose weekly methotrexate versus azathioprine in rheumatoid arthritis: 3-year prospective study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this