Communicating justice: A comparison of courts and police use of contemporary media

Jane Johnston, Alyce Mcgovern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As social media becomes firmly entrenched in professional communication practice, organizations need to consider the efficacy of their overall media praxis. Within this context, this article investigates the stakeholder communication practices of two of the most important arms of the justice system: the police and the courts. Focusing on the Australian condition, while also providing international comparisons, this paper draws on historical, sociocultural, and legal developments by the communication departments of these two sectors to identify fundamental differences in their development, motivations, and objectives, which, in turn, have placed them in vastly different positions for the transition to social media. Finally, in determining their place within the field of democratic communication practice, it positions courts and police within Habermas' schemas of communicative and strategic action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1667-1687
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Communication
Volume7
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Law enforcement
police
justice
communication
Communication
social media
international comparison
stakeholder

Cite this

@article{dfaf3ffadd8d4ed3aba28c1c9b7ad66d,
title = "Communicating justice: A comparison of courts and police use of contemporary media",
abstract = "As social media becomes firmly entrenched in professional communication practice, organizations need to consider the efficacy of their overall media praxis. Within this context, this article investigates the stakeholder communication practices of two of the most important arms of the justice system: the police and the courts. Focusing on the Australian condition, while also providing international comparisons, this paper draws on historical, sociocultural, and legal developments by the communication departments of these two sectors to identify fundamental differences in their development, motivations, and objectives, which, in turn, have placed them in vastly different positions for the transition to social media. Finally, in determining their place within the field of democratic communication practice, it positions courts and police within Habermas' schemas of communicative and strategic action.",
author = "Jane Johnston and Alyce Mcgovern",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1667--1687",
journal = "International Journal of Communication",
issn = "1932-8036",
publisher = "USC ANNENBERG PRESS",
number = "1",

}

Communicating justice : A comparison of courts and police use of contemporary media. / Johnston, Jane; Mcgovern, Alyce.

In: International Journal of Communication, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2013, p. 1667-1687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating justice

T2 - A comparison of courts and police use of contemporary media

AU - Johnston, Jane

AU - Mcgovern, Alyce

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - As social media becomes firmly entrenched in professional communication practice, organizations need to consider the efficacy of their overall media praxis. Within this context, this article investigates the stakeholder communication practices of two of the most important arms of the justice system: the police and the courts. Focusing on the Australian condition, while also providing international comparisons, this paper draws on historical, sociocultural, and legal developments by the communication departments of these two sectors to identify fundamental differences in their development, motivations, and objectives, which, in turn, have placed them in vastly different positions for the transition to social media. Finally, in determining their place within the field of democratic communication practice, it positions courts and police within Habermas' schemas of communicative and strategic action.

AB - As social media becomes firmly entrenched in professional communication practice, organizations need to consider the efficacy of their overall media praxis. Within this context, this article investigates the stakeholder communication practices of two of the most important arms of the justice system: the police and the courts. Focusing on the Australian condition, while also providing international comparisons, this paper draws on historical, sociocultural, and legal developments by the communication departments of these two sectors to identify fundamental differences in their development, motivations, and objectives, which, in turn, have placed them in vastly different positions for the transition to social media. Finally, in determining their place within the field of democratic communication practice, it positions courts and police within Habermas' schemas of communicative and strategic action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920507413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1667

EP - 1687

JO - International Journal of Communication

JF - International Journal of Communication

SN - 1932-8036

IS - 1

ER -