Cognitive trait anxiety, stress and effort interact to predict inhibitory control

Mark S. Edwards, Elizabeth J. Edwards, Michael Lyvers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few studies have focussed on the link between anxiety and inhibitory control in the absence of stimulus-driven external threat. This two-part experiment examined the interactions between (1) somatic trait anxiety, somatic situational stress (i.e. threat of electric shock), and effort, and (2) cognitive trait anxiety, cognitive situational stress (i.e. ego-threat instructions), and effort, on inhibitory processes using a Go-No-Go paradigm. Trait anxiety was operationalised using questionnaire scores and effort was operationalised using a visual analogue scale. Performance effectiveness was measured using the d′ parameter from signal detection theory and processing efficiency was indexed by the ratio of d′ to response time on correct trials. Results indicated that somatic trait anxiety and stress did not predict effectiveness or efficiency. Cognitive trait anxiety and stress were associated with both inhibitory effectiveness and efficiency deficits; however, contrary to expectations these deficits were evident at higher rather than lower mental effort. Results suggest a distinction between how somatic and cognitive anxiety manifest on tasks involving inhibitory control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)671-686
Number of pages16
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2017

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Ego
Inhibitory Control
Trait Anxiety
Visual Analog Scale
Reaction Time
Shock
Threat
Situational

Cite this

Edwards, Mark S. ; Edwards, Elizabeth J. ; Lyvers, Michael. / Cognitive trait anxiety, stress and effort interact to predict inhibitory control. In: Cognition and Emotion. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 671-686.
@article{0b7fb8b0d86c495990c6e5631960f6f9,
title = "Cognitive trait anxiety, stress and effort interact to predict inhibitory control",
abstract = "Few studies have focussed on the link between anxiety and inhibitory control in the absence of stimulus-driven external threat. This two-part experiment examined the interactions between (1) somatic trait anxiety, somatic situational stress (i.e. threat of electric shock), and effort, and (2) cognitive trait anxiety, cognitive situational stress (i.e. ego-threat instructions), and effort, on inhibitory processes using a Go-No-Go paradigm. Trait anxiety was operationalised using questionnaire scores and effort was operationalised using a visual analogue scale. Performance effectiveness was measured using the d′ parameter from signal detection theory and processing efficiency was indexed by the ratio of d′ to response time on correct trials. Results indicated that somatic trait anxiety and stress did not predict effectiveness or efficiency. Cognitive trait anxiety and stress were associated with both inhibitory effectiveness and efficiency deficits; however, contrary to expectations these deficits were evident at higher rather than lower mental effort. Results suggest a distinction between how somatic and cognitive anxiety manifest on tasks involving inhibitory control.",
author = "Edwards, {Mark S.} and Edwards, {Elizabeth J.} and Michael Lyvers",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1080/02699931.2016.1152232",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "671--686",
journal = "Cognition and Emotion",
issn = "0269-9931",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Cognitive trait anxiety, stress and effort interact to predict inhibitory control. / Edwards, Mark S.; Edwards, Elizabeth J.; Lyvers, Michael.

In: Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 31, No. 4, 19.05.2017, p. 671-686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive trait anxiety, stress and effort interact to predict inhibitory control

AU - Edwards, Mark S.

AU - Edwards, Elizabeth J.

AU - Lyvers, Michael

PY - 2017/5/19

Y1 - 2017/5/19

N2 - Few studies have focussed on the link between anxiety and inhibitory control in the absence of stimulus-driven external threat. This two-part experiment examined the interactions between (1) somatic trait anxiety, somatic situational stress (i.e. threat of electric shock), and effort, and (2) cognitive trait anxiety, cognitive situational stress (i.e. ego-threat instructions), and effort, on inhibitory processes using a Go-No-Go paradigm. Trait anxiety was operationalised using questionnaire scores and effort was operationalised using a visual analogue scale. Performance effectiveness was measured using the d′ parameter from signal detection theory and processing efficiency was indexed by the ratio of d′ to response time on correct trials. Results indicated that somatic trait anxiety and stress did not predict effectiveness or efficiency. Cognitive trait anxiety and stress were associated with both inhibitory effectiveness and efficiency deficits; however, contrary to expectations these deficits were evident at higher rather than lower mental effort. Results suggest a distinction between how somatic and cognitive anxiety manifest on tasks involving inhibitory control.

AB - Few studies have focussed on the link between anxiety and inhibitory control in the absence of stimulus-driven external threat. This two-part experiment examined the interactions between (1) somatic trait anxiety, somatic situational stress (i.e. threat of electric shock), and effort, and (2) cognitive trait anxiety, cognitive situational stress (i.e. ego-threat instructions), and effort, on inhibitory processes using a Go-No-Go paradigm. Trait anxiety was operationalised using questionnaire scores and effort was operationalised using a visual analogue scale. Performance effectiveness was measured using the d′ parameter from signal detection theory and processing efficiency was indexed by the ratio of d′ to response time on correct trials. Results indicated that somatic trait anxiety and stress did not predict effectiveness or efficiency. Cognitive trait anxiety and stress were associated with both inhibitory effectiveness and efficiency deficits; however, contrary to expectations these deficits were evident at higher rather than lower mental effort. Results suggest a distinction between how somatic and cognitive anxiety manifest on tasks involving inhibitory control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961202794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699931.2016.1152232

DO - 10.1080/02699931.2016.1152232

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 671

EP - 686

JO - Cognition and Emotion

JF - Cognition and Emotion

SN - 0269-9931

IS - 4

ER -