Clinical supervisors and cultural competence

Gabriella Berger, Sheree Conroy, Anita Peerson, Victoria Brazil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how clinical supervisors of junior doctors provide feedback and assessment on cultural competence, one of several professionalism skills outlined in the Australian Curriculum Framework for Junior Doctors. Methods: Twenty clinical supervisors were recruited to a qualitative study in a regional hospital in Queensland, Australia. Data from semi-structured interviews (June-August 2011) were thematically analysed. Results: Interviews revealed that cultural competence was interpreted by the supervising clinicians as a vague concept, and that junior doctors were not assessed in this area. Additional themes related to the cultural competence of junior doctors, as reported by their supervisors, included: limited direct supervision of, and feedback to, junior doctors; variations in approaches to assessment; clinicians' communication focuses on clinical aspects of disease process; perceived lack of cultural diversity among staff and patients; acceptance of laypersons as English interpreters; language barriers with international medical graduates; and patients' low levels of health literacy. Conclusion: Supervisors were unable to define cultural competence in ways that enable them to apply the concept to clinical training for junior doctors. Specific training in cultural competence, and guidelines for its assessment, is therefore recommended for clinical supervisors and junior doctors to improve their approaches to patient care and health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-374
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Teacher
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cultural Competency
Clinical Competence
Interviews
Communication Barriers
Health Literacy
Cultural Diversity
Queensland
Curriculum
Health Status
Patient Care
Communication
Guidelines
Health

Cite this

Berger, G., Conroy, S., Peerson, A., & Brazil, V. (2014). Clinical supervisors and cultural competence. Clinical Teacher, 11(5), 370-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12170
Berger, Gabriella ; Conroy, Sheree ; Peerson, Anita ; Brazil, Victoria. / Clinical supervisors and cultural competence. In: Clinical Teacher. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 5. pp. 370-374.
@article{02d19f9e7afd45da8da430a6f14084c1,
title = "Clinical supervisors and cultural competence",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate how clinical supervisors of junior doctors provide feedback and assessment on cultural competence, one of several professionalism skills outlined in the Australian Curriculum Framework for Junior Doctors. Methods: Twenty clinical supervisors were recruited to a qualitative study in a regional hospital in Queensland, Australia. Data from semi-structured interviews (June-August 2011) were thematically analysed. Results: Interviews revealed that cultural competence was interpreted by the supervising clinicians as a vague concept, and that junior doctors were not assessed in this area. Additional themes related to the cultural competence of junior doctors, as reported by their supervisors, included: limited direct supervision of, and feedback to, junior doctors; variations in approaches to assessment; clinicians' communication focuses on clinical aspects of disease process; perceived lack of cultural diversity among staff and patients; acceptance of laypersons as English interpreters; language barriers with international medical graduates; and patients' low levels of health literacy. Conclusion: Supervisors were unable to define cultural competence in ways that enable them to apply the concept to clinical training for junior doctors. Specific training in cultural competence, and guidelines for its assessment, is therefore recommended for clinical supervisors and junior doctors to improve their approaches to patient care and health outcomes.",
author = "Gabriella Berger and Sheree Conroy and Anita Peerson and Victoria Brazil",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/tct.12170",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "370--374",
journal = "Clinical Teacher",
issn = "1743-4971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Berger, G, Conroy, S, Peerson, A & Brazil, V 2014, 'Clinical supervisors and cultural competence' Clinical Teacher, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 370-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12170

Clinical supervisors and cultural competence. / Berger, Gabriella; Conroy, Sheree; Peerson, Anita; Brazil, Victoria.

In: Clinical Teacher, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2014, p. 370-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical supervisors and cultural competence

AU - Berger, Gabriella

AU - Conroy, Sheree

AU - Peerson, Anita

AU - Brazil, Victoria

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To investigate how clinical supervisors of junior doctors provide feedback and assessment on cultural competence, one of several professionalism skills outlined in the Australian Curriculum Framework for Junior Doctors. Methods: Twenty clinical supervisors were recruited to a qualitative study in a regional hospital in Queensland, Australia. Data from semi-structured interviews (June-August 2011) were thematically analysed. Results: Interviews revealed that cultural competence was interpreted by the supervising clinicians as a vague concept, and that junior doctors were not assessed in this area. Additional themes related to the cultural competence of junior doctors, as reported by their supervisors, included: limited direct supervision of, and feedback to, junior doctors; variations in approaches to assessment; clinicians' communication focuses on clinical aspects of disease process; perceived lack of cultural diversity among staff and patients; acceptance of laypersons as English interpreters; language barriers with international medical graduates; and patients' low levels of health literacy. Conclusion: Supervisors were unable to define cultural competence in ways that enable them to apply the concept to clinical training for junior doctors. Specific training in cultural competence, and guidelines for its assessment, is therefore recommended for clinical supervisors and junior doctors to improve their approaches to patient care and health outcomes.

AB - Objective: To investigate how clinical supervisors of junior doctors provide feedback and assessment on cultural competence, one of several professionalism skills outlined in the Australian Curriculum Framework for Junior Doctors. Methods: Twenty clinical supervisors were recruited to a qualitative study in a regional hospital in Queensland, Australia. Data from semi-structured interviews (June-August 2011) were thematically analysed. Results: Interviews revealed that cultural competence was interpreted by the supervising clinicians as a vague concept, and that junior doctors were not assessed in this area. Additional themes related to the cultural competence of junior doctors, as reported by their supervisors, included: limited direct supervision of, and feedback to, junior doctors; variations in approaches to assessment; clinicians' communication focuses on clinical aspects of disease process; perceived lack of cultural diversity among staff and patients; acceptance of laypersons as English interpreters; language barriers with international medical graduates; and patients' low levels of health literacy. Conclusion: Supervisors were unable to define cultural competence in ways that enable them to apply the concept to clinical training for junior doctors. Specific training in cultural competence, and guidelines for its assessment, is therefore recommended for clinical supervisors and junior doctors to improve their approaches to patient care and health outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904301946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/tct.12170

DO - 10.1111/tct.12170

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 370

EP - 374

JO - Clinical Teacher

JF - Clinical Teacher

SN - 1743-4971

IS - 5

ER -

Berger G, Conroy S, Peerson A, Brazil V. Clinical supervisors and cultural competence. Clinical Teacher. 2014;11(5):370-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12170