Clinical predictors of a positive response to guided diagnostic block into the subacromial bursa

Angela Cadogan, Mark Laslett, Wayne Hing, Peter McNair, Stephen Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of combinations of clinical examination findings for predicting a positive response to injection of local anaesthetic into the subacromial bursa.

DESIGN: Prospective, cohort, diagnostic validity design.

SUBJECTS: Consecutive patients with shoulder pain recruited from primary care physiotherapy and general medical practices.

METHODS: All subjects underwent a standardised clinical examination (index test) followed by a diagnostic injection of xylocaineTM into the subacromial bursa (reference standard test) performed under ultrasound guidance. Clinical examination variables associated with a positive anaesthetic response (≥ 80% post-injection reduction in pain intensity) were identified (p < 0.20) and diagnostic accuracy was calculated.

RESULTS: Of the 196 subjects who received a subacromial bursa injection, 66 subjects (34%) reported a positive anaesthetic response. Strain injury (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.3), anterior shoulder pain (AOR 2.3) and absence of pain with external rotation at 90º abduction (AOR 3.9) were the strongest clinical predictors of positive anaesthetic response. Clinical prediction model variables demonstrated 100% specificity (3 positive tests) but low sensitivity (maximum 40%) for a positive anaesthetic response. Combinations of 9 other clinical variables also demonstrated 100% specificity (7 or more positive tests), and improved sensitivity (95 to 100%) for a PAR compared with clinical prediction model variables when less than two findings were present.

CONCLUSION: Combinations of these clinical tests may assist the clinician to differentiate subacromial pain from other shoulder conditions and guide selection of targeted pain management interventions. Additional diagnostic tests may be required when clinical criteria are not satisfied.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)877-84
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume44
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shoulder Pain
Anesthetics
Injections
Odds Ratio
Pain
Pain Management
Local Anesthetics
Routine Diagnostic Tests
General Practice
Primary Health Care
Wounds and Injuries

Cite this

Cadogan, Angela ; Laslett, Mark ; Hing, Wayne ; McNair, Peter ; Taylor, Stephen. / Clinical predictors of a positive response to guided diagnostic block into the subacromial bursa. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 10. pp. 877-84.
@article{0904926c90ee42d68f6a2e0bd7b4d0f7,
title = "Clinical predictors of a positive response to guided diagnostic block into the subacromial bursa",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of combinations of clinical examination findings for predicting a positive response to injection of local anaesthetic into the subacromial bursa.DESIGN: Prospective, cohort, diagnostic validity design.SUBJECTS: Consecutive patients with shoulder pain recruited from primary care physiotherapy and general medical practices.METHODS: All subjects underwent a standardised clinical examination (index test) followed by a diagnostic injection of xylocaineTM into the subacromial bursa (reference standard test) performed under ultrasound guidance. Clinical examination variables associated with a positive anaesthetic response (≥ 80{\%} post-injection reduction in pain intensity) were identified (p < 0.20) and diagnostic accuracy was calculated.RESULTS: Of the 196 subjects who received a subacromial bursa injection, 66 subjects (34{\%}) reported a positive anaesthetic response. Strain injury (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.3), anterior shoulder pain (AOR 2.3) and absence of pain with external rotation at 90º abduction (AOR 3.9) were the strongest clinical predictors of positive anaesthetic response. Clinical prediction model variables demonstrated 100{\%} specificity (3 positive tests) but low sensitivity (maximum 40{\%}) for a positive anaesthetic response. Combinations of 9 other clinical variables also demonstrated 100{\%} specificity (7 or more positive tests), and improved sensitivity (95 to 100{\%}) for a PAR compared with clinical prediction model variables when less than two findings were present.CONCLUSION: Combinations of these clinical tests may assist the clinician to differentiate subacromial pain from other shoulder conditions and guide selection of targeted pain management interventions. Additional diagnostic tests may be required when clinical criteria are not satisfied.",
author = "Angela Cadogan and Mark Laslett and Wayne Hing and Peter McNair and Stephen Taylor",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.2340/16501977-1049",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "877--84",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "0036-5505",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "10",

}

Clinical predictors of a positive response to guided diagnostic block into the subacromial bursa. / Cadogan, Angela; Laslett, Mark; Hing, Wayne; McNair, Peter; Taylor, Stephen.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 10, 2012, p. 877-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical predictors of a positive response to guided diagnostic block into the subacromial bursa

AU - Cadogan, Angela

AU - Laslett, Mark

AU - Hing, Wayne

AU - McNair, Peter

AU - Taylor, Stephen

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of combinations of clinical examination findings for predicting a positive response to injection of local anaesthetic into the subacromial bursa.DESIGN: Prospective, cohort, diagnostic validity design.SUBJECTS: Consecutive patients with shoulder pain recruited from primary care physiotherapy and general medical practices.METHODS: All subjects underwent a standardised clinical examination (index test) followed by a diagnostic injection of xylocaineTM into the subacromial bursa (reference standard test) performed under ultrasound guidance. Clinical examination variables associated with a positive anaesthetic response (≥ 80% post-injection reduction in pain intensity) were identified (p < 0.20) and diagnostic accuracy was calculated.RESULTS: Of the 196 subjects who received a subacromial bursa injection, 66 subjects (34%) reported a positive anaesthetic response. Strain injury (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.3), anterior shoulder pain (AOR 2.3) and absence of pain with external rotation at 90º abduction (AOR 3.9) were the strongest clinical predictors of positive anaesthetic response. Clinical prediction model variables demonstrated 100% specificity (3 positive tests) but low sensitivity (maximum 40%) for a positive anaesthetic response. Combinations of 9 other clinical variables also demonstrated 100% specificity (7 or more positive tests), and improved sensitivity (95 to 100%) for a PAR compared with clinical prediction model variables when less than two findings were present.CONCLUSION: Combinations of these clinical tests may assist the clinician to differentiate subacromial pain from other shoulder conditions and guide selection of targeted pain management interventions. Additional diagnostic tests may be required when clinical criteria are not satisfied.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of combinations of clinical examination findings for predicting a positive response to injection of local anaesthetic into the subacromial bursa.DESIGN: Prospective, cohort, diagnostic validity design.SUBJECTS: Consecutive patients with shoulder pain recruited from primary care physiotherapy and general medical practices.METHODS: All subjects underwent a standardised clinical examination (index test) followed by a diagnostic injection of xylocaineTM into the subacromial bursa (reference standard test) performed under ultrasound guidance. Clinical examination variables associated with a positive anaesthetic response (≥ 80% post-injection reduction in pain intensity) were identified (p < 0.20) and diagnostic accuracy was calculated.RESULTS: Of the 196 subjects who received a subacromial bursa injection, 66 subjects (34%) reported a positive anaesthetic response. Strain injury (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.3), anterior shoulder pain (AOR 2.3) and absence of pain with external rotation at 90º abduction (AOR 3.9) were the strongest clinical predictors of positive anaesthetic response. Clinical prediction model variables demonstrated 100% specificity (3 positive tests) but low sensitivity (maximum 40%) for a positive anaesthetic response. Combinations of 9 other clinical variables also demonstrated 100% specificity (7 or more positive tests), and improved sensitivity (95 to 100%) for a PAR compared with clinical prediction model variables when less than two findings were present.CONCLUSION: Combinations of these clinical tests may assist the clinician to differentiate subacromial pain from other shoulder conditions and guide selection of targeted pain management interventions. Additional diagnostic tests may be required when clinical criteria are not satisfied.

U2 - 10.2340/16501977-1049

DO - 10.2340/16501977-1049

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 877

EP - 884

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 0036-5505

IS - 10

ER -