Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation

Jay Forder

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper the author discusses whether Anglo- Australian Common Law is likely to offer any protection to a website user who clicks an 'I agree' button without reading the terms. The issue examined is not whether the terms can be set aside for being unconscionable or unfair; but whether and in what circumstances unread terms will be seen as having been incorporated into an online agreement. The starting point for the discussion is whether the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob (that a signer is bound by whatever they sign) applies. After several observations about the suggestion that a button click should not be treated as a signature, the author moves on to discuss the objective test for contract formation and the extent to which the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob is consistent with this test. The author reaches the regrettable conclusion that, as a result of the Australian High Court decision in Toll v Alphapharm, the button clicker is unlikely to have much protection from Australian Common Law.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaw across nations
Subtitle of host publicationGovernance, policy & statutes
EditorsSylvia Mercado Kierkegaard
Place of PublicationHellerup, Denmark
PublisherInternational Association of IT Lawyers
Pages342
Number of pages352
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9788799138593
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

common law
court decision
website

Cite this

Forder, J. (2011). Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation. In S. Mercado Kierkegaard (Ed.), Law across nations: Governance, policy & statutes (1 ed., pp. 342). [11] Hellerup, Denmark: International Association of IT Lawyers.
Forder, Jay. / Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation. Law across nations: Governance, policy & statutes. editor / Sylvia Mercado Kierkegaard. 1. ed. Hellerup, Denmark : International Association of IT Lawyers, 2011. pp. 342
@inbook{d7e90784d17542a59284eda3a3245eb6,
title = "Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation",
abstract = "In this paper the author discusses whether Anglo- Australian Common Law is likely to offer any protection to a website user who clicks an 'I agree' button without reading the terms. The issue examined is not whether the terms can be set aside for being unconscionable or unfair; but whether and in what circumstances unread terms will be seen as having been incorporated into an online agreement. The starting point for the discussion is whether the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob (that a signer is bound by whatever they sign) applies. After several observations about the suggestion that a button click should not be treated as a signature, the author moves on to discuss the objective test for contract formation and the extent to which the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob is consistent with this test. The author reaches the regrettable conclusion that, as a result of the Australian High Court decision in Toll v Alphapharm, the button clicker is unlikely to have much protection from Australian Common Law.",
author = "Jay Forder",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788799138593",
pages = "342",
editor = "{Mercado Kierkegaard}, Sylvia",
booktitle = "Law across nations",
publisher = "International Association of IT Lawyers",
edition = "1",

}

Forder, J 2011, Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation. in S Mercado Kierkegaard (ed.), Law across nations: Governance, policy & statutes. 1 edn, 11, International Association of IT Lawyers, Hellerup, Denmark, pp. 342.

Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation. / Forder, Jay.

Law across nations: Governance, policy & statutes. ed. / Sylvia Mercado Kierkegaard. 1. ed. Hellerup, Denmark : International Association of IT Lawyers, 2011. p. 342 11.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation

AU - Forder, Jay

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this paper the author discusses whether Anglo- Australian Common Law is likely to offer any protection to a website user who clicks an 'I agree' button without reading the terms. The issue examined is not whether the terms can be set aside for being unconscionable or unfair; but whether and in what circumstances unread terms will be seen as having been incorporated into an online agreement. The starting point for the discussion is whether the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob (that a signer is bound by whatever they sign) applies. After several observations about the suggestion that a button click should not be treated as a signature, the author moves on to discuss the objective test for contract formation and the extent to which the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob is consistent with this test. The author reaches the regrettable conclusion that, as a result of the Australian High Court decision in Toll v Alphapharm, the button clicker is unlikely to have much protection from Australian Common Law.

AB - In this paper the author discusses whether Anglo- Australian Common Law is likely to offer any protection to a website user who clicks an 'I agree' button without reading the terms. The issue examined is not whether the terms can be set aside for being unconscionable or unfair; but whether and in what circumstances unread terms will be seen as having been incorporated into an online agreement. The starting point for the discussion is whether the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob (that a signer is bound by whatever they sign) applies. After several observations about the suggestion that a button click should not be treated as a signature, the author moves on to discuss the objective test for contract formation and the extent to which the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob is consistent with this test. The author reaches the regrettable conclusion that, as a result of the Australian High Court decision in Toll v Alphapharm, the button clicker is unlikely to have much protection from Australian Common Law.

UR - http://www.worldcat.org/title/law-across-nations-governance-policy-statutes/oclc/770454266

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9788799138593

SP - 342

BT - Law across nations

A2 - Mercado Kierkegaard, Sylvia

PB - International Association of IT Lawyers

CY - Hellerup, Denmark

ER -

Forder J. Clickwrap agreements, signed documents and the objective test for contract formation. In Mercado Kierkegaard S, editor, Law across nations: Governance, policy & statutes. 1 ed. Hellerup, Denmark: International Association of IT Lawyers. 2011. p. 342. 11