Abstract
This commentary refers to ‘Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis’, by M. Bakhit et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae002 and the discussion piece ‘Cardiovascular disease risk communication alone is not enough: why a recent review may be misleading’, by S. Griffiths et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae529.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | ehae530 |
| Pages (from-to) | 4241 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | European Heart Journal |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 39 |
| Early online date | 13 Sept 2024 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 14 Oct 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clearing up misunderstandings: addressing issues in recent cardiovascular risk review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related Research Outputs
- 1 Citations
- 1 Review article
-
Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: A meta-analysis
Bakhit, M., Fien, S., Abukmail, E., Jones, M., Clark, J., Scott, A. M., Glasziou, P. & Cardona, M., 19 Jan 2024, In: European Heart Journal. 45, 12, p. 998-1013 16 p., ehae002.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer-review
Open Access29 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)66 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver