Chromosomal aberrations in squamous cell carcinoma and solar keratoses revealed by comparative genomic hybridization

Kevin J. Ashton, Stephen R. Weinstein, David J. Maguire, Lyn R. Griffiths*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: To identify chromosomal copy numbers of frequent genetic aberrations within squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and solar keratoses (SKs), and provide further evidence to support or challenge current dogma concerning the relationship between these lesions. Design: Retrospective analysis of genetic aberrations in DNA from SK and SCC biopsy specimens by comparative genomic hybridization. Setting: University-based research laboratory in Queensland, Australia. Patients: Twenty-two biopsy specimens from patients with diagnosed SKs (n = 7), cutaneous SCCs (n = 10), or adjoining lesions (n = 5). Main Outcome Measure: Identification of frequent genetic aberrations both specific to SK and SCC and shared by these lesions to investigate their clonal relationship. Results: Shared genomic imbalances were identified in SK and SCC. Frequent gains were located at chromosome arms 3q, 17q, 4p, 14q, Xq, 5p, 9q, 8q, 17p, and 20q, whereas shared regional losses were observed at 9p, 3p, 13q, 17p, 11p, 8q, and 18p. Significant loss of 18q was observed only in SCC lesions. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that numerous chromosomal aberrations are shared by the 2 lesions, suggesting a clonal relationship between SK and SCC. Additionally, the genomic loss of 18q may be a significant event in SK progression to SCC. Finally, the type and frequency of aberrations suggests a common mode of tumorigenesis in SCC-derived tumors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)876-882
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Dermatology
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2003
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Chromosomal aberrations in squamous cell carcinoma and solar keratoses revealed by comparative genomic hybridization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this