China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic

Alica Kizekova

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

[Extract]
This chapter examines China’s activities in Central and Eastern European
Countries (hereinafter referred to as ‘CEECs’), with a specific reference to
the 16+1 platform, during a time of the emerging Belt and Road Initiative
(BRI). In Europe, this initiative has been looked upon with suspicion and
referred to as a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy, aiming to potentially disrupt
the workings of the European Union. The argument presented here is that
the cooperation between China and the CEECs has not been a one-sided
activity. Some countries did not hide their enthusiasm for forging closer
partnerships with China and embracing the China-led 16+1 platform, as
well as BRI. The Czech Republic is a case in point; however, it still questions
the benefits of opening up to China and what the real outcomes of promised
investments domestically and in the wider region are. In response to the
criticisms, the Chinese leadership has reassured the Europeans that China is
acting peacefully under a win-win premise for all parties involved and that
the activities within the 16+1 take in consideration the existing projects,
such as China-EU cooperation and the EU infrastructure projects.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSecuring the Belt and Road Initiative
Subtitle of host publicationRisk Assessment, Private Security and Special Insurances Along the New Wave of Chinese Outbound Investments
EditorsAlessandro Arduino, Xue Gong
Place of PublicationSingapore
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter15
Pages275-297
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)978-981-10-7116-4
ISBN (Print)978-981-10-7115-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Czech Republic
road
China
EU
leadership
infrastructure

Cite this

Kizekova, A. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic. In A. Arduino, & X. Gong (Eds.), Securing the Belt and Road Initiative: Risk Assessment, Private Security and Special Insurances Along the New Wave of Chinese Outbound Investments (pp. 275-297). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-981-10-7116-4_15
Kizekova, Alica. / China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic. Securing the Belt and Road Initiative: Risk Assessment, Private Security and Special Insurances Along the New Wave of Chinese Outbound Investments. editor / Alessandro Arduino ; Xue Gong. Singapore : Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. pp. 275-297
@inbook{7c6bc9f917fa40039de7128499831181,
title = "China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic",
abstract = "[Extract]This chapter examines China’s activities in Central and Eastern EuropeanCountries (hereinafter referred to as ‘CEECs’), with a specific reference tothe 16+1 platform, during a time of the emerging Belt and Road Initiative(BRI). In Europe, this initiative has been looked upon with suspicion andreferred to as a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy, aiming to potentially disruptthe workings of the European Union. The argument presented here is thatthe cooperation between China and the CEECs has not been a one-sidedactivity. Some countries did not hide their enthusiasm for forging closerpartnerships with China and embracing the China-led 16+1 platform, aswell as BRI. The Czech Republic is a case in point; however, it still questionsthe benefits of opening up to China and what the real outcomes of promisedinvestments domestically and in the wider region are. In response to thecriticisms, the Chinese leadership has reassured the Europeans that China isacting peacefully under a win-win premise for all parties involved and thatthe activities within the 16+1 take in consideration the existing projects,such as China-EU cooperation and the EU infrastructure projects.",
author = "Alica Kizekova",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007{\%}2F978-981-10-7116-4_15",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-981-10-7115-7",
pages = "275--297",
editor = "Arduino, {Alessandro } and Gong, {Xue }",
booktitle = "Securing the Belt and Road Initiative",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

Kizekova, A 2018, China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic. in A Arduino & X Gong (eds), Securing the Belt and Road Initiative: Risk Assessment, Private Security and Special Insurances Along the New Wave of Chinese Outbound Investments. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp. 275-297. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-981-10-7116-4_15

China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic. / Kizekova, Alica.

Securing the Belt and Road Initiative: Risk Assessment, Private Security and Special Insurances Along the New Wave of Chinese Outbound Investments. ed. / Alessandro Arduino; Xue Gong. Singapore : Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. p. 275-297.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic

AU - Kizekova, Alica

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - [Extract]This chapter examines China’s activities in Central and Eastern EuropeanCountries (hereinafter referred to as ‘CEECs’), with a specific reference tothe 16+1 platform, during a time of the emerging Belt and Road Initiative(BRI). In Europe, this initiative has been looked upon with suspicion andreferred to as a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy, aiming to potentially disruptthe workings of the European Union. The argument presented here is thatthe cooperation between China and the CEECs has not been a one-sidedactivity. Some countries did not hide their enthusiasm for forging closerpartnerships with China and embracing the China-led 16+1 platform, aswell as BRI. The Czech Republic is a case in point; however, it still questionsthe benefits of opening up to China and what the real outcomes of promisedinvestments domestically and in the wider region are. In response to thecriticisms, the Chinese leadership has reassured the Europeans that China isacting peacefully under a win-win premise for all parties involved and thatthe activities within the 16+1 take in consideration the existing projects,such as China-EU cooperation and the EU infrastructure projects.

AB - [Extract]This chapter examines China’s activities in Central and Eastern EuropeanCountries (hereinafter referred to as ‘CEECs’), with a specific reference tothe 16+1 platform, during a time of the emerging Belt and Road Initiative(BRI). In Europe, this initiative has been looked upon with suspicion andreferred to as a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy, aiming to potentially disruptthe workings of the European Union. The argument presented here is thatthe cooperation between China and the CEECs has not been a one-sidedactivity. Some countries did not hide their enthusiasm for forging closerpartnerships with China and embracing the China-led 16+1 platform, aswell as BRI. The Czech Republic is a case in point; however, it still questionsthe benefits of opening up to China and what the real outcomes of promisedinvestments domestically and in the wider region are. In response to thecriticisms, the Chinese leadership has reassured the Europeans that China isacting peacefully under a win-win premise for all parties involved and thatthe activities within the 16+1 take in consideration the existing projects,such as China-EU cooperation and the EU infrastructure projects.

U2 - 10.1007%2F978-981-10-7116-4_15

DO - 10.1007%2F978-981-10-7116-4_15

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-981-10-7115-7

SP - 275

EP - 297

BT - Securing the Belt and Road Initiative

A2 - Arduino, Alessandro

A2 - Gong, Xue

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Singapore

ER -

Kizekova A. China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Platform: The Case of the Czech Republic. In Arduino A, Gong X, editors, Securing the Belt and Road Initiative: Risk Assessment, Private Security and Special Insurances Along the New Wave of Chinese Outbound Investments. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. 2018. p. 275-297 https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-981-10-7116-4_15