Childhood obesity: should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence

Marie Westwood, Debra Fayter, Suzanne Hartley, Amber Rithalia, Gary Butler, Paul Glasziou, Martin Bland, John Nixon, Lisa Stirk, Mary Rudolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Population monitoring has been introduced in UK primary schools in an effort to track the growing obesity epidemic. It has been argued that parents should be informed of their child's results, but is there evidence that moving from monitoring to screening would be effective? We describe what is known about the effectiveness of monitoring and screening for overweight and obesity in primary school children and highlight areas where evidence is lacking and research should be prioritised.

Design: Systematic review with discussion of evidence gaps and future research.

Data sources: Published and unpublished studies ( any language) from electronic databases ( inception to July 2005), clinical experts, Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities, and reference lists of retrieved studies.

Review methods: We included any study that evaluated measures of overweight and obesity as part of a population-level assessment and excluded studies whose primary outcome measure was prevalence. Results: There were no trials assessing the effectiveness of monitoring or screening for overweight and obesity. Studies focussed on the diagnostic accuracy of measurements. Information on the attitudes of children, parents and health professionals to monitoring was extremely sparse.

Conclusions: Our review found a lack of data on the potential impact of population monitoring or screening for obesity and more research is indicated. Identification of effective weight reduction strategies for children and clarification of the role of preventative measures are priorities. It is difficult to see how screening to identify individual children can be justified without effective interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)416-422
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood
Volume92
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Westwood, Marie ; Fayter, Debra ; Hartley, Suzanne ; Rithalia, Amber ; Butler, Gary ; Glasziou, Paul ; Bland, Martin ; Nixon, John ; Stirk, Lisa ; Rudolf, Mary. / Childhood obesity : should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence. In: Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2007 ; Vol. 92, No. 5. pp. 416-422.
@article{8968a69f906f4289a6c8b9759a78d56f,
title = "Childhood obesity: should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence",
abstract = "Background: Population monitoring has been introduced in UK primary schools in an effort to track the growing obesity epidemic. It has been argued that parents should be informed of their child's results, but is there evidence that moving from monitoring to screening would be effective? We describe what is known about the effectiveness of monitoring and screening for overweight and obesity in primary school children and highlight areas where evidence is lacking and research should be prioritised.Design: Systematic review with discussion of evidence gaps and future research.Data sources: Published and unpublished studies ( any language) from electronic databases ( inception to July 2005), clinical experts, Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities, and reference lists of retrieved studies.Review methods: We included any study that evaluated measures of overweight and obesity as part of a population-level assessment and excluded studies whose primary outcome measure was prevalence. Results: There were no trials assessing the effectiveness of monitoring or screening for overweight and obesity. Studies focussed on the diagnostic accuracy of measurements. Information on the attitudes of children, parents and health professionals to monitoring was extremely sparse.Conclusions: Our review found a lack of data on the potential impact of population monitoring or screening for obesity and more research is indicated. Identification of effective weight reduction strategies for children and clarification of the role of preventative measures are priorities. It is difficult to see how screening to identify individual children can be justified without effective interventions.",
author = "Marie Westwood and Debra Fayter and Suzanne Hartley and Amber Rithalia and Gary Butler and Paul Glasziou and Martin Bland and John Nixon and Lisa Stirk and Mary Rudolf",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1136/adc.2006.113589",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "416--422",
journal = "Archives of Disease in Childhood",
issn = "0003-9888",
publisher = "B M J PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "5",

}

Westwood, M, Fayter, D, Hartley, S, Rithalia, A, Butler, G, Glasziou, P, Bland, M, Nixon, J, Stirk, L & Rudolf, M 2007, 'Childhood obesity: should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence' Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 416-422. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.113589

Childhood obesity : should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence. / Westwood, Marie; Fayter, Debra; Hartley, Suzanne; Rithalia, Amber; Butler, Gary; Glasziou, Paul; Bland, Martin; Nixon, John; Stirk, Lisa; Rudolf, Mary.

In: Archives of Disease in Childhood, Vol. 92, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 416-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Childhood obesity

T2 - should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence

AU - Westwood, Marie

AU - Fayter, Debra

AU - Hartley, Suzanne

AU - Rithalia, Amber

AU - Butler, Gary

AU - Glasziou, Paul

AU - Bland, Martin

AU - Nixon, John

AU - Stirk, Lisa

AU - Rudolf, Mary

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Background: Population monitoring has been introduced in UK primary schools in an effort to track the growing obesity epidemic. It has been argued that parents should be informed of their child's results, but is there evidence that moving from monitoring to screening would be effective? We describe what is known about the effectiveness of monitoring and screening for overweight and obesity in primary school children and highlight areas where evidence is lacking and research should be prioritised.Design: Systematic review with discussion of evidence gaps and future research.Data sources: Published and unpublished studies ( any language) from electronic databases ( inception to July 2005), clinical experts, Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities, and reference lists of retrieved studies.Review methods: We included any study that evaluated measures of overweight and obesity as part of a population-level assessment and excluded studies whose primary outcome measure was prevalence. Results: There were no trials assessing the effectiveness of monitoring or screening for overweight and obesity. Studies focussed on the diagnostic accuracy of measurements. Information on the attitudes of children, parents and health professionals to monitoring was extremely sparse.Conclusions: Our review found a lack of data on the potential impact of population monitoring or screening for obesity and more research is indicated. Identification of effective weight reduction strategies for children and clarification of the role of preventative measures are priorities. It is difficult to see how screening to identify individual children can be justified without effective interventions.

AB - Background: Population monitoring has been introduced in UK primary schools in an effort to track the growing obesity epidemic. It has been argued that parents should be informed of their child's results, but is there evidence that moving from monitoring to screening would be effective? We describe what is known about the effectiveness of monitoring and screening for overweight and obesity in primary school children and highlight areas where evidence is lacking and research should be prioritised.Design: Systematic review with discussion of evidence gaps and future research.Data sources: Published and unpublished studies ( any language) from electronic databases ( inception to July 2005), clinical experts, Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities, and reference lists of retrieved studies.Review methods: We included any study that evaluated measures of overweight and obesity as part of a population-level assessment and excluded studies whose primary outcome measure was prevalence. Results: There were no trials assessing the effectiveness of monitoring or screening for overweight and obesity. Studies focussed on the diagnostic accuracy of measurements. Information on the attitudes of children, parents and health professionals to monitoring was extremely sparse.Conclusions: Our review found a lack of data on the potential impact of population monitoring or screening for obesity and more research is indicated. Identification of effective weight reduction strategies for children and clarification of the role of preventative measures are priorities. It is difficult to see how screening to identify individual children can be justified without effective interventions.

U2 - 10.1136/adc.2006.113589

DO - 10.1136/adc.2006.113589

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 416

EP - 422

JO - Archives of Disease in Childhood

JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood

SN - 0003-9888

IS - 5

ER -