Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions: pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid

Kasey R Boehmer, Claudia C Dobler, Anjali Thota, Megan Branda, Rachel Giblon, Emma Behnken, Paige Organick, Summer V Allen, Kevin Shaw, Victor M Montori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters.

METHODS: A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter.

RESULTS: 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits.

CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02390570.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere029105
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Feasibility Studies
Primary Health Care
Medication Adherence
Diet
Health

Cite this

Boehmer, Kasey R ; Dobler, Claudia C ; Thota, Anjali ; Branda, Megan ; Giblon, Rachel ; Behnken, Emma ; Organick, Paige ; Allen, Summer V ; Shaw, Kevin ; Montori, Victor M. / Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions : pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid. In: BMJ Open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 9.
@article{b69f68ea4d8c4ec298f9c9f7d11a680b,
title = "Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions: pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters.METHODS: A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter.RESULTS: 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits.CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02390570.",
author = "Boehmer, {Kasey R} and Dobler, {Claudia C} and Anjali Thota and Megan Branda and Rachel Giblon and Emma Behnken and Paige Organick and Allen, {Summer V} and Kevin Shaw and Montori, {Victor M}",
note = "{\circledC} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029105",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

Boehmer, KR, Dobler, CC, Thota, A, Branda, M, Giblon, R, Behnken, E, Organick, P, Allen, SV, Shaw, K & Montori, VM 2019, 'Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions: pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid' BMJ Open, vol. 9, no. 9, e029105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029105

Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions : pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid. / Boehmer, Kasey R; Dobler, Claudia C; Thota, Anjali; Branda, Megan; Giblon, Rachel; Behnken, Emma; Organick, Paige; Allen, Summer V; Shaw, Kevin; Montori, Victor M.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 9, e029105, 03.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions

T2 - pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid

AU - Boehmer, Kasey R

AU - Dobler, Claudia C

AU - Thota, Anjali

AU - Branda, Megan

AU - Giblon, Rachel

AU - Behnken, Emma

AU - Organick, Paige

AU - Allen, Summer V

AU - Shaw, Kevin

AU - Montori, Victor M

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2019/9/3

Y1 - 2019/9/3

N2 - PURPOSE: To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters.METHODS: A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter.RESULTS: 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits.CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02390570.

AB - PURPOSE: To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters.METHODS: A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter.RESULTS: 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits.CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02390570.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071754270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029105

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029105

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e029105

ER -