Case study of demolition costs of residential buildings

Sung Kin Pun, Chunlu Liu, Craig Ashley Langston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Building demolition is one of the most common activities in the construction industry. Several demolition techniques are commonly used, including mechanical demolition, deconstruction and hybrid demolition. Although deconstruction has been advocated for its environmentally friendly approaches, the cost comparison of a demolition project under different techniques is rarely researched. In this paper, the cost of a demolition project is broken down to input and output costs, which are further broken down to more countable sections. Through an empirical study in Victoria, Australia, project costs of mechanical demolition, hybrid demolition and deconstruction are investigated. It is found that deconstruction has the greatest profitability among the three techniques. Hybrid demolition, which is the actual technique adopted by the contractor, has a slightly lower profit, and mechanical demolition is the most expensive. Although deconstruction has the best overall economical performance, the small extra gain comes with increased complexity and risk that deters demolition contractors from its attempt. It is found in the paper that an optimized demolition project strategy exists between hybrid demolition and deconstruction with the greatest profitability among various building demolition techniques.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)967-976
Number of pages10
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Demolition
Costs
Profitability
Residential buildings
Contractors
Construction industry
Deconstruction

Cite this

@article{16758b17bb0c4bc4979cb5cab29db2f1,
title = "Case study of demolition costs of residential buildings",
abstract = "Building demolition is one of the most common activities in the construction industry. Several demolition techniques are commonly used, including mechanical demolition, deconstruction and hybrid demolition. Although deconstruction has been advocated for its environmentally friendly approaches, the cost comparison of a demolition project under different techniques is rarely researched. In this paper, the cost of a demolition project is broken down to input and output costs, which are further broken down to more countable sections. Through an empirical study in Victoria, Australia, project costs of mechanical demolition, hybrid demolition and deconstruction are investigated. It is found that deconstruction has the greatest profitability among the three techniques. Hybrid demolition, which is the actual technique adopted by the contractor, has a slightly lower profit, and mechanical demolition is the most expensive. Although deconstruction has the best overall economical performance, the small extra gain comes with increased complexity and risk that deters demolition contractors from its attempt. It is found in the paper that an optimized demolition project strategy exists between hybrid demolition and deconstruction with the greatest profitability among various building demolition techniques.",
author = "Pun, {Sung Kin} and Chunlu Liu and Langston, {Craig Ashley}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/01446190500512024",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "967--976",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "9",

}

Case study of demolition costs of residential buildings. / Pun, Sung Kin; Liu, Chunlu; Langston, Craig Ashley.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 24, No. 9, 2006, p. 967-976.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case study of demolition costs of residential buildings

AU - Pun, Sung Kin

AU - Liu, Chunlu

AU - Langston, Craig Ashley

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Building demolition is one of the most common activities in the construction industry. Several demolition techniques are commonly used, including mechanical demolition, deconstruction and hybrid demolition. Although deconstruction has been advocated for its environmentally friendly approaches, the cost comparison of a demolition project under different techniques is rarely researched. In this paper, the cost of a demolition project is broken down to input and output costs, which are further broken down to more countable sections. Through an empirical study in Victoria, Australia, project costs of mechanical demolition, hybrid demolition and deconstruction are investigated. It is found that deconstruction has the greatest profitability among the three techniques. Hybrid demolition, which is the actual technique adopted by the contractor, has a slightly lower profit, and mechanical demolition is the most expensive. Although deconstruction has the best overall economical performance, the small extra gain comes with increased complexity and risk that deters demolition contractors from its attempt. It is found in the paper that an optimized demolition project strategy exists between hybrid demolition and deconstruction with the greatest profitability among various building demolition techniques.

AB - Building demolition is one of the most common activities in the construction industry. Several demolition techniques are commonly used, including mechanical demolition, deconstruction and hybrid demolition. Although deconstruction has been advocated for its environmentally friendly approaches, the cost comparison of a demolition project under different techniques is rarely researched. In this paper, the cost of a demolition project is broken down to input and output costs, which are further broken down to more countable sections. Through an empirical study in Victoria, Australia, project costs of mechanical demolition, hybrid demolition and deconstruction are investigated. It is found that deconstruction has the greatest profitability among the three techniques. Hybrid demolition, which is the actual technique adopted by the contractor, has a slightly lower profit, and mechanical demolition is the most expensive. Although deconstruction has the best overall economical performance, the small extra gain comes with increased complexity and risk that deters demolition contractors from its attempt. It is found in the paper that an optimized demolition project strategy exists between hybrid demolition and deconstruction with the greatest profitability among various building demolition techniques.

U2 - 10.1080/01446190500512024

DO - 10.1080/01446190500512024

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 967

EP - 976

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 9

ER -