Can we fight stigma with science? The effect of aetiological framing on attitudes towards anorexia nervosa and the impact on volitional stigma

Amy Jean Bannatyne, Lisa Marie Abel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study experimentally investigated the way in which exposure to various aetiological explanations of anorexia nervosa (AN) differentially affected stigmatisation and behavioural intention outcomes. University students (N=161) were randomly assigned to read one of four aetiological vignettes presenting the causes of AN as biological/genetic, socio-cultural, environmental, or multifactorial. Results indicate that those who received a socio-cultural explanation made stronger socio-cultural causal attributions, fewer biological/genetic causal attributions, and were significantly less willing to sign a health insurance petition for AN. Unexpectedly, the multifactorial group considered individuals with AN as more responsible and blameworthy for their condition. Overall, findings were comparative with previous research and partially support the propositions of attribution theory. Results also suggest that by conceptualising the aetiology of AN as biological or genetic, or at least increasing one's knowledge of these contributing factors, it may be possible to decrease the level of blame-based stigma associated with AN.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-46
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Journal of Psychology
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Anorexia Nervosa
Stereotyping
Health Insurance
Students
Research

Cite this

@article{e7c87fe0402144dcae7099d55498b3d9,
title = "Can we fight stigma with science? The effect of aetiological framing on attitudes towards anorexia nervosa and the impact on volitional stigma",
abstract = "The present study experimentally investigated the way in which exposure to various aetiological explanations of anorexia nervosa (AN) differentially affected stigmatisation and behavioural intention outcomes. University students (N=161) were randomly assigned to read one of four aetiological vignettes presenting the causes of AN as biological/genetic, socio-cultural, environmental, or multifactorial. Results indicate that those who received a socio-cultural explanation made stronger socio-cultural causal attributions, fewer biological/genetic causal attributions, and were significantly less willing to sign a health insurance petition for AN. Unexpectedly, the multifactorial group considered individuals with AN as more responsible and blameworthy for their condition. Overall, findings were comparative with previous research and partially support the propositions of attribution theory. Results also suggest that by conceptualising the aetiology of AN as biological or genetic, or at least increasing one's knowledge of these contributing factors, it may be possible to decrease the level of blame-based stigma associated with AN.",
author = "Bannatyne, {Amy Jean} and Abel, {Lisa Marie}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ajpy.12062",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "38--46",
journal = "Australian Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0004-9530",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Can we fight stigma with science? The effect of aetiological framing on attitudes towards anorexia nervosa and the impact on volitional stigma. / Bannatyne, Amy Jean; Abel, Lisa Marie.

In: Australian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 38-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we fight stigma with science? The effect of aetiological framing on attitudes towards anorexia nervosa and the impact on volitional stigma

AU - Bannatyne, Amy Jean

AU - Abel, Lisa Marie

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - The present study experimentally investigated the way in which exposure to various aetiological explanations of anorexia nervosa (AN) differentially affected stigmatisation and behavioural intention outcomes. University students (N=161) were randomly assigned to read one of four aetiological vignettes presenting the causes of AN as biological/genetic, socio-cultural, environmental, or multifactorial. Results indicate that those who received a socio-cultural explanation made stronger socio-cultural causal attributions, fewer biological/genetic causal attributions, and were significantly less willing to sign a health insurance petition for AN. Unexpectedly, the multifactorial group considered individuals with AN as more responsible and blameworthy for their condition. Overall, findings were comparative with previous research and partially support the propositions of attribution theory. Results also suggest that by conceptualising the aetiology of AN as biological or genetic, or at least increasing one's knowledge of these contributing factors, it may be possible to decrease the level of blame-based stigma associated with AN.

AB - The present study experimentally investigated the way in which exposure to various aetiological explanations of anorexia nervosa (AN) differentially affected stigmatisation and behavioural intention outcomes. University students (N=161) were randomly assigned to read one of four aetiological vignettes presenting the causes of AN as biological/genetic, socio-cultural, environmental, or multifactorial. Results indicate that those who received a socio-cultural explanation made stronger socio-cultural causal attributions, fewer biological/genetic causal attributions, and were significantly less willing to sign a health insurance petition for AN. Unexpectedly, the multifactorial group considered individuals with AN as more responsible and blameworthy for their condition. Overall, findings were comparative with previous research and partially support the propositions of attribution theory. Results also suggest that by conceptualising the aetiology of AN as biological or genetic, or at least increasing one's knowledge of these contributing factors, it may be possible to decrease the level of blame-based stigma associated with AN.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920989252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajpy.12062

DO - 10.1111/ajpy.12062

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 38

EP - 46

JO - Australian Journal of Psychology

JF - Australian Journal of Psychology

SN - 0004-9530

IS - 1

ER -