Can using simulation improve graduate physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning (measured by the critical thinking in respiratory questionnaire) and improve on-call competency?

Debbie Thackray, Suzanne Gough

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background On-call physiotherapy is a duty expected of all qualified physiotherapists. It is important to ensure that on-call physiotherapists are appropriately trained. It is hypothesised that simulation may be a suitable method for training post-graduate staff for on-call duties, even if respiratory is not their chosen speciality. This project is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation for developing clinical reasoning, and to address the real world challenge of how to train staff and maintain competency for working in respiratory care.

Methodology: mixed methods approach
A pre-post design will be used to evaluate the impact of simulation training on clinical reasoning, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and competency.
Video-ethnography featuring triangulation of skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning.

Methodology: mixed methods approach Participants will attend a day of simulation training and be video-recorded assessing and treating simulated patients. The participants’ self-perception of their clinical reasoning and competency for on-call will be measured using the ‘Critical Thinking in Respiratory Care’ instrument (CTRC);1 secondly with the ‘ACPRC on-call clinical competency questionnaire’2 before and immediately after the training. The participants’ perception of the effect of the simulation training will be measured immediately post-simulation via the ‘Simulation User’s Evaluation Questionnaire’.3 The CTRC and the ACPRC questionnaires will be repeated at 6 months after the training.

Analysis Means and standard deviations will be analysed for all outcome measures.1–3 The primary analysis will be a paired t-test of pre and immediate post-training CTRC scores to evaluate the effect of training on clinical reasoning. Participants’ skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning will be compared to the scenario learning outcomes developed by expert physiotherapists and respiratory academics and triangulated with the video data to determine the effect of training.

Potential impact It is anticipated that training using simulation will improve the self-confidence and self-efficacy of on-call physiotherapists alongside performance improvements.

References
Goodfellow LT, Valentine T, Holt ME. Construction and validation of an instrument to assess critical thinking in respiratory care: an empirical process. Respir Care Educ J 1999;8:13–26
Thomas S, Gough S, Broad MA, Cross J, Harden B, Ritson P, et al. On call competence: developing a tool for self-assessment. Physiotherapy 2008;94:204–211
Levett Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, Arthur C, Roche J. The development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31(7):705–710
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)A15-A16
Number of pages2
JournalBMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
Volume1
Issue numberSuppl 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2015
Externally publishedYes
EventThe 6th Annual Conference of the Association for Simulated Practice in Healthcare - Brighton, United Kingdom
Duration: 3 Nov 20155 Nov 2015
Conference number: 6th

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Physical Therapists
Self Efficacy
Cultural Anthropology
Psychometrics
Self Concept
Mental Competency
Nurses
Learning
Surveys and Questionnaires
Thinking
Simulation Training

Cite this

@article{9f581e763bc8458bbc0d87afbae7aa1e,
title = "Can using simulation improve graduate physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning (measured by the critical thinking in respiratory questionnaire) and improve on-call competency?",
abstract = "Background On-call physiotherapy is a duty expected of all qualified physiotherapists. It is important to ensure that on-call physiotherapists are appropriately trained. It is hypothesised that simulation may be a suitable method for training post-graduate staff for on-call duties, even if respiratory is not their chosen speciality. This project is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation for developing clinical reasoning, and to address the real world challenge of how to train staff and maintain competency for working in respiratory care.Methodology: mixed methods approachA pre-post design will be used to evaluate the impact of simulation training on clinical reasoning, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and competency.Video-ethnography featuring triangulation of skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning.Methodology: mixed methods approach Participants will attend a day of simulation training and be video-recorded assessing and treating simulated patients. The participants’ self-perception of their clinical reasoning and competency for on-call will be measured using the ‘Critical Thinking in Respiratory Care’ instrument (CTRC);1 secondly with the ‘ACPRC on-call clinical competency questionnaire’2 before and immediately after the training. The participants’ perception of the effect of the simulation training will be measured immediately post-simulation via the ‘Simulation User’s Evaluation Questionnaire’.3 The CTRC and the ACPRC questionnaires will be repeated at 6 months after the training.Analysis Means and standard deviations will be analysed for all outcome measures.1–3 The primary analysis will be a paired t-test of pre and immediate post-training CTRC scores to evaluate the effect of training on clinical reasoning. Participants’ skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning will be compared to the scenario learning outcomes developed by expert physiotherapists and respiratory academics and triangulated with the video data to determine the effect of training.Potential impact It is anticipated that training using simulation will improve the self-confidence and self-efficacy of on-call physiotherapists alongside performance improvements.ReferencesGoodfellow LT, Valentine T, Holt ME. Construction and validation of an instrument to assess critical thinking in respiratory care: an empirical process. Respir Care Educ J 1999;8:13–26Thomas S, Gough S, Broad MA, Cross J, Harden B, Ritson P, et al. On call competence: developing a tool for self-assessment. Physiotherapy 2008;94:204–211Levett Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, Arthur C, Roche J. The development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31(7):705–710",
author = "Debbie Thackray and Suzanne Gough",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.38",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "A15--A16",
journal = "BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning",
issn = "2056-6697",
publisher = "B M J PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "Suppl 2",

}

Can using simulation improve graduate physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning (measured by the critical thinking in respiratory questionnaire) and improve on-call competency? / Thackray, Debbie; Gough, Suzanne.

In: BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 1, No. Suppl 2, 02.11.2015, p. A15-A16.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can using simulation improve graduate physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning (measured by the critical thinking in respiratory questionnaire) and improve on-call competency?

AU - Thackray, Debbie

AU - Gough, Suzanne

PY - 2015/11/2

Y1 - 2015/11/2

N2 - Background On-call physiotherapy is a duty expected of all qualified physiotherapists. It is important to ensure that on-call physiotherapists are appropriately trained. It is hypothesised that simulation may be a suitable method for training post-graduate staff for on-call duties, even if respiratory is not their chosen speciality. This project is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation for developing clinical reasoning, and to address the real world challenge of how to train staff and maintain competency for working in respiratory care.Methodology: mixed methods approachA pre-post design will be used to evaluate the impact of simulation training on clinical reasoning, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and competency.Video-ethnography featuring triangulation of skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning.Methodology: mixed methods approach Participants will attend a day of simulation training and be video-recorded assessing and treating simulated patients. The participants’ self-perception of their clinical reasoning and competency for on-call will be measured using the ‘Critical Thinking in Respiratory Care’ instrument (CTRC);1 secondly with the ‘ACPRC on-call clinical competency questionnaire’2 before and immediately after the training. The participants’ perception of the effect of the simulation training will be measured immediately post-simulation via the ‘Simulation User’s Evaluation Questionnaire’.3 The CTRC and the ACPRC questionnaires will be repeated at 6 months after the training.Analysis Means and standard deviations will be analysed for all outcome measures.1–3 The primary analysis will be a paired t-test of pre and immediate post-training CTRC scores to evaluate the effect of training on clinical reasoning. Participants’ skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning will be compared to the scenario learning outcomes developed by expert physiotherapists and respiratory academics and triangulated with the video data to determine the effect of training.Potential impact It is anticipated that training using simulation will improve the self-confidence and self-efficacy of on-call physiotherapists alongside performance improvements.ReferencesGoodfellow LT, Valentine T, Holt ME. Construction and validation of an instrument to assess critical thinking in respiratory care: an empirical process. Respir Care Educ J 1999;8:13–26Thomas S, Gough S, Broad MA, Cross J, Harden B, Ritson P, et al. On call competence: developing a tool for self-assessment. Physiotherapy 2008;94:204–211Levett Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, Arthur C, Roche J. The development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31(7):705–710

AB - Background On-call physiotherapy is a duty expected of all qualified physiotherapists. It is important to ensure that on-call physiotherapists are appropriately trained. It is hypothesised that simulation may be a suitable method for training post-graduate staff for on-call duties, even if respiratory is not their chosen speciality. This project is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation for developing clinical reasoning, and to address the real world challenge of how to train staff and maintain competency for working in respiratory care.Methodology: mixed methods approachA pre-post design will be used to evaluate the impact of simulation training on clinical reasoning, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and competency.Video-ethnography featuring triangulation of skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning.Methodology: mixed methods approach Participants will attend a day of simulation training and be video-recorded assessing and treating simulated patients. The participants’ self-perception of their clinical reasoning and competency for on-call will be measured using the ‘Critical Thinking in Respiratory Care’ instrument (CTRC);1 secondly with the ‘ACPRC on-call clinical competency questionnaire’2 before and immediately after the training. The participants’ perception of the effect of the simulation training will be measured immediately post-simulation via the ‘Simulation User’s Evaluation Questionnaire’.3 The CTRC and the ACPRC questionnaires will be repeated at 6 months after the training.Analysis Means and standard deviations will be analysed for all outcome measures.1–3 The primary analysis will be a paired t-test of pre and immediate post-training CTRC scores to evaluate the effect of training on clinical reasoning. Participants’ skills, behaviours and clinical reasoning will be compared to the scenario learning outcomes developed by expert physiotherapists and respiratory academics and triangulated with the video data to determine the effect of training.Potential impact It is anticipated that training using simulation will improve the self-confidence and self-efficacy of on-call physiotherapists alongside performance improvements.ReferencesGoodfellow LT, Valentine T, Holt ME. Construction and validation of an instrument to assess critical thinking in respiratory care: an empirical process. Respir Care Educ J 1999;8:13–26Thomas S, Gough S, Broad MA, Cross J, Harden B, Ritson P, et al. On call competence: developing a tool for self-assessment. Physiotherapy 2008;94:204–211Levett Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, Arthur C, Roche J. The development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale. Nurse Educ Today 2011;31(7):705–710

U2 - 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.38

DO - 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.38

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 1

SP - A15-A16

JO - BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning

JF - BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning

SN - 2056-6697

IS - Suppl 2

ER -