Can nudge-interventions address health service overuse and underuse? Protocol for a systematic review

Mary O'Keeffe, Adrian C. Traeger, Tammy Hoffmann, Giovanni Esteves Ferreira, Jason Soon, Christopher Maher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction Nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals are proposed to reduce the overuse and underuse of health services. However, little is known about their effectiveness at changing health professionals' behaviours in relation to overuse or underuse of tests or treatments. Objective The aim of this study is to systematically identify and synthesise the studies that have assessed the effect of nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals on the overuse or underuse of health services. Methods and analysis We will perform a systematic review. All study designs that include a control comparison will be included. Any qualified health professional, across any specialty or setting, will be included. Only nudge-interventions aimed at altering the behaviour of health professionals will be included. We will examine the effect of choice architecture nudges (default options, active choice, framing effects, order effects) and social nudges (accountable justification and pre-commitment or publicly declared pledge/contract). Studies with outcomes relevant to overuse or underuse of health services will be included. Relevant studies will be identified by a computer-aided search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO databases. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility, extract data and perform the risk of bias assessment using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. We will report our results in a structured synthesis format, as recommended by the Cochrane EPOC group. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere029540
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Health Services Misuse
Health
Organizations
Contracts
Ethics
MEDLINE
Libraries
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Medical Overuse
Databases

Cite this

O'Keeffe, Mary ; Traeger, Adrian C. ; Hoffmann, Tammy ; Ferreira, Giovanni Esteves ; Soon, Jason ; Maher, Christopher. / Can nudge-interventions address health service overuse and underuse? Protocol for a systematic review. In: BMJ Open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 6.
@article{75154d6c47f24e99ad8de98651fd9265,
title = "Can nudge-interventions address health service overuse and underuse? Protocol for a systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction Nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals are proposed to reduce the overuse and underuse of health services. However, little is known about their effectiveness at changing health professionals' behaviours in relation to overuse or underuse of tests or treatments. Objective The aim of this study is to systematically identify and synthesise the studies that have assessed the effect of nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals on the overuse or underuse of health services. Methods and analysis We will perform a systematic review. All study designs that include a control comparison will be included. Any qualified health professional, across any specialty or setting, will be included. Only nudge-interventions aimed at altering the behaviour of health professionals will be included. We will examine the effect of choice architecture nudges (default options, active choice, framing effects, order effects) and social nudges (accountable justification and pre-commitment or publicly declared pledge/contract). Studies with outcomes relevant to overuse or underuse of health services will be included. Relevant studies will be identified by a computer-aided search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO databases. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility, extract data and perform the risk of bias assessment using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. We will report our results in a structured synthesis format, as recommended by the Cochrane EPOC group. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.",
author = "Mary O'Keeffe and Traeger, {Adrian C.} and Tammy Hoffmann and Ferreira, {Giovanni Esteves} and Jason Soon and Christopher Maher",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029540",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

Can nudge-interventions address health service overuse and underuse? Protocol for a systematic review. / O'Keeffe, Mary; Traeger, Adrian C.; Hoffmann, Tammy; Ferreira, Giovanni Esteves; Soon, Jason; Maher, Christopher.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 6, e029540, 01.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can nudge-interventions address health service overuse and underuse? Protocol for a systematic review

AU - O'Keeffe, Mary

AU - Traeger, Adrian C.

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

AU - Ferreira, Giovanni Esteves

AU - Soon, Jason

AU - Maher, Christopher

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Introduction Nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals are proposed to reduce the overuse and underuse of health services. However, little is known about their effectiveness at changing health professionals' behaviours in relation to overuse or underuse of tests or treatments. Objective The aim of this study is to systematically identify and synthesise the studies that have assessed the effect of nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals on the overuse or underuse of health services. Methods and analysis We will perform a systematic review. All study designs that include a control comparison will be included. Any qualified health professional, across any specialty or setting, will be included. Only nudge-interventions aimed at altering the behaviour of health professionals will be included. We will examine the effect of choice architecture nudges (default options, active choice, framing effects, order effects) and social nudges (accountable justification and pre-commitment or publicly declared pledge/contract). Studies with outcomes relevant to overuse or underuse of health services will be included. Relevant studies will be identified by a computer-aided search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO databases. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility, extract data and perform the risk of bias assessment using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. We will report our results in a structured synthesis format, as recommended by the Cochrane EPOC group. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.

AB - Introduction Nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals are proposed to reduce the overuse and underuse of health services. However, little is known about their effectiveness at changing health professionals' behaviours in relation to overuse or underuse of tests or treatments. Objective The aim of this study is to systematically identify and synthesise the studies that have assessed the effect of nudge-interventions aimed at health professionals on the overuse or underuse of health services. Methods and analysis We will perform a systematic review. All study designs that include a control comparison will be included. Any qualified health professional, across any specialty or setting, will be included. Only nudge-interventions aimed at altering the behaviour of health professionals will be included. We will examine the effect of choice architecture nudges (default options, active choice, framing effects, order effects) and social nudges (accountable justification and pre-commitment or publicly declared pledge/contract). Studies with outcomes relevant to overuse or underuse of health services will be included. Relevant studies will be identified by a computer-aided search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO databases. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility, extract data and perform the risk of bias assessment using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. We will report our results in a structured synthesis format, as recommended by the Cochrane EPOC group. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. Results will be presented at relevant scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068113057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029540

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029540

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e029540

ER -