Bursting bubbles: Linking experimental financial market results to field market data

Julia Henker, Sian Owen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The laboratory, where variables can be measured and controlled, is perhaps the most efficient place to test scientific theory, yet in general empirical financial research neglects experimental finance results. We link laboratory findings to actual, or field, data, applying the Smith, Suchanek and Williams [1988] experimental market model to Australian stock exchange data. We introduce modifications that improve the model's fit to field market conditions. The experimental model is a reliable predictor of field market bubble bursts in more than 50% of the cases we test, and our modifications improve the performance to 77% of the cases. Our results suggest that experimental financial market results should be accorded more attention in empirical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-14
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Behavioral Finance
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{493fa973ed7648e994a310fe9a86904c,
title = "Bursting bubbles: Linking experimental financial market results to field market data",
abstract = "The laboratory, where variables can be measured and controlled, is perhaps the most efficient place to test scientific theory, yet in general empirical financial research neglects experimental finance results. We link laboratory findings to actual, or field, data, applying the Smith, Suchanek and Williams [1988] experimental market model to Australian stock exchange data. We introduce modifications that improve the model's fit to field market conditions. The experimental model is a reliable predictor of field market bubble bursts in more than 50{\%} of the cases we test, and our modifications improve the performance to 77{\%} of the cases. Our results suggest that experimental financial market results should be accorded more attention in empirical research.",
author = "Julia Henker and Sian Owen",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/15427560801896602",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "5--14",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Finance",
issn = "1520-8834",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Bursting bubbles : Linking experimental financial market results to field market data. / Henker, Julia; Owen, Sian.

In: Journal of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, p. 5-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bursting bubbles

T2 - Linking experimental financial market results to field market data

AU - Henker, Julia

AU - Owen, Sian

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The laboratory, where variables can be measured and controlled, is perhaps the most efficient place to test scientific theory, yet in general empirical financial research neglects experimental finance results. We link laboratory findings to actual, or field, data, applying the Smith, Suchanek and Williams [1988] experimental market model to Australian stock exchange data. We introduce modifications that improve the model's fit to field market conditions. The experimental model is a reliable predictor of field market bubble bursts in more than 50% of the cases we test, and our modifications improve the performance to 77% of the cases. Our results suggest that experimental financial market results should be accorded more attention in empirical research.

AB - The laboratory, where variables can be measured and controlled, is perhaps the most efficient place to test scientific theory, yet in general empirical financial research neglects experimental finance results. We link laboratory findings to actual, or field, data, applying the Smith, Suchanek and Williams [1988] experimental market model to Australian stock exchange data. We introduce modifications that improve the model's fit to field market conditions. The experimental model is a reliable predictor of field market bubble bursts in more than 50% of the cases we test, and our modifications improve the performance to 77% of the cases. Our results suggest that experimental financial market results should be accorded more attention in empirical research.

U2 - 10.1080/15427560801896602

DO - 10.1080/15427560801896602

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 5

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Behavioral Finance

JF - Journal of Behavioral Finance

SN - 1520-8834

IS - 1

ER -