Bronchoscopic diagnosis of endoscopically visible lung malignancies: Should cytological examinations be carried out routinely?

C. C. Dobler, A. B.H. Crawford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible malignancies and to evaluate whether cytological examination, including bronchial washings and brushings, increase the diagnostic yield compared with bronchial biopsy alone. Methods: We reviewed a series of bronchoscopies over a period of 7.5 years in which an endoscopically visible tumour was identified and which had a definite cytological or histological diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy obtained by bronchoscopy or any other examination. Results: The criteria were met by 174 bronchoscopies. In 155 bronchoscopies all specimens including bronchial washings, brushings and biopsies were obtained; the overall diagnostic yield was 88%. This compared with a diagnostic yield of 77% for biopsies only (P < 0.001). The individual diagnostic yields for biopsies, brushings and washings were 77, 50 and 38%, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield of cytology was 61%, providing a diagnosis in 95 patients. Of 11 repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy, 9 were diagnostic. Conclusion: The tumour detection rate with flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible lung malignancies is high. Cytology-based sampling techniques by means of bronchial washings and brushings significantly increase the overall diagnostic yield compared with forceps biopsy only. Repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy have a relatively high diagnostic yield and should therefore be considered in all patients with endoscopically visible tumour.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)806-811
Number of pages6
JournalInternal Medicine Journal
Volume39
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bronchoscopy
Lung
Neoplasms
Biopsy
Cell Biology
Surgical Instruments

Cite this

@article{e10f3e46603f4346ae109f88751ae0e0,
title = "Bronchoscopic diagnosis of endoscopically visible lung malignancies: Should cytological examinations be carried out routinely?",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible malignancies and to evaluate whether cytological examination, including bronchial washings and brushings, increase the diagnostic yield compared with bronchial biopsy alone. Methods: We reviewed a series of bronchoscopies over a period of 7.5 years in which an endoscopically visible tumour was identified and which had a definite cytological or histological diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy obtained by bronchoscopy or any other examination. Results: The criteria were met by 174 bronchoscopies. In 155 bronchoscopies all specimens including bronchial washings, brushings and biopsies were obtained; the overall diagnostic yield was 88{\%}. This compared with a diagnostic yield of 77{\%} for biopsies only (P < 0.001). The individual diagnostic yields for biopsies, brushings and washings were 77, 50 and 38{\%}, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield of cytology was 61{\%}, providing a diagnosis in 95 patients. Of 11 repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy, 9 were diagnostic. Conclusion: The tumour detection rate with flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible lung malignancies is high. Cytology-based sampling techniques by means of bronchial washings and brushings significantly increase the overall diagnostic yield compared with forceps biopsy only. Repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy have a relatively high diagnostic yield and should therefore be considered in all patients with endoscopically visible tumour.",
author = "Dobler, {C. C.} and Crawford, {A. B.H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01882.x",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "806--811",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine",
issn = "1444-0903",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

Bronchoscopic diagnosis of endoscopically visible lung malignancies : Should cytological examinations be carried out routinely? / Dobler, C. C.; Crawford, A. B.H.

In: Internal Medicine Journal, Vol. 39, No. 12, 01.12.2009, p. 806-811.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bronchoscopic diagnosis of endoscopically visible lung malignancies

T2 - Should cytological examinations be carried out routinely?

AU - Dobler, C. C.

AU - Crawford, A. B.H.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible malignancies and to evaluate whether cytological examination, including bronchial washings and brushings, increase the diagnostic yield compared with bronchial biopsy alone. Methods: We reviewed a series of bronchoscopies over a period of 7.5 years in which an endoscopically visible tumour was identified and which had a definite cytological or histological diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy obtained by bronchoscopy or any other examination. Results: The criteria were met by 174 bronchoscopies. In 155 bronchoscopies all specimens including bronchial washings, brushings and biopsies were obtained; the overall diagnostic yield was 88%. This compared with a diagnostic yield of 77% for biopsies only (P < 0.001). The individual diagnostic yields for biopsies, brushings and washings were 77, 50 and 38%, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield of cytology was 61%, providing a diagnosis in 95 patients. Of 11 repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy, 9 were diagnostic. Conclusion: The tumour detection rate with flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible lung malignancies is high. Cytology-based sampling techniques by means of bronchial washings and brushings significantly increase the overall diagnostic yield compared with forceps biopsy only. Repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy have a relatively high diagnostic yield and should therefore be considered in all patients with endoscopically visible tumour.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible malignancies and to evaluate whether cytological examination, including bronchial washings and brushings, increase the diagnostic yield compared with bronchial biopsy alone. Methods: We reviewed a series of bronchoscopies over a period of 7.5 years in which an endoscopically visible tumour was identified and which had a definite cytological or histological diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy obtained by bronchoscopy or any other examination. Results: The criteria were met by 174 bronchoscopies. In 155 bronchoscopies all specimens including bronchial washings, brushings and biopsies were obtained; the overall diagnostic yield was 88%. This compared with a diagnostic yield of 77% for biopsies only (P < 0.001). The individual diagnostic yields for biopsies, brushings and washings were 77, 50 and 38%, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield of cytology was 61%, providing a diagnosis in 95 patients. Of 11 repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy, 9 were diagnostic. Conclusion: The tumour detection rate with flexible bronchoscopy in endoscopically visible lung malignancies is high. Cytology-based sampling techniques by means of bronchial washings and brushings significantly increase the overall diagnostic yield compared with forceps biopsy only. Repeat bronchoscopies after an initial non-diagnostic bronchoscopy have a relatively high diagnostic yield and should therefore be considered in all patients with endoscopically visible tumour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73649111409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01882.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01882.x

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 806

EP - 811

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

SN - 1444-0903

IS - 12

ER -