Blockchain versus data protection

Christopher Kuner*, Fred H Cate, Orla Lynskey, Christopher Millard, Nora Ni Loideain, Dan Jerker B Svantesson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is not uncommon for technological developments to give rise to debates as to whether existing legal norms and regulatory frameworks will be disrupted or undermined. A recent, high-profile, example is blockchain.

Most of the popular excitement about blockchain, so far at least, relates to crypto-currencies, especially Bitcoin, and related financial products such as Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Less visibly, but probably more importantly in the long run, a great deal of investment is going into the development of a broad range of blockchain applications in contexts ranging from registration of assets (including land) to self-executing (‘smart’) contracts. Notwithstanding widespread confusion about what exactly blockchain is or might become, blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) have caught the imagination of governments, businesses, and private investors, and they are increasingly a focus of attention for legislators and regulators worldwide.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-104
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Data Privacy Law
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

regulatory framework
technological development
currency
land
norm
contract
registration
data protection
product

Cite this

Kuner, C., Cate, F. H., Lynskey, O., Millard, C., Loideain, N. N., & Svantesson, D. J. B. (2018). Blockchain versus data protection. International Data Privacy Law, 8(2), 103-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy009
Kuner, Christopher ; Cate, Fred H ; Lynskey, Orla ; Millard, Christopher ; Loideain, Nora Ni ; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. / Blockchain versus data protection. In: International Data Privacy Law. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 103-104.
@article{07810a65dab34eb680b5d794237d6d0a,
title = "Blockchain versus data protection",
abstract = "It is not uncommon for technological developments to give rise to debates as to whether existing legal norms and regulatory frameworks will be disrupted or undermined. A recent, high-profile, example is blockchain.Most of the popular excitement about blockchain, so far at least, relates to crypto-currencies, especially Bitcoin, and related financial products such as Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Less visibly, but probably more importantly in the long run, a great deal of investment is going into the development of a broad range of blockchain applications in contexts ranging from registration of assets (including land) to self-executing (‘smart’) contracts. Notwithstanding widespread confusion about what exactly blockchain is or might become, blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) have caught the imagination of governments, businesses, and private investors, and they are increasingly a focus of attention for legislators and regulators worldwide.",
author = "Christopher Kuner and Cate, {Fred H} and Orla Lynskey and Christopher Millard and Loideain, {Nora Ni} and Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1093/idpl/ipy009",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "103--104",
journal = "International Data Privacy Law",
issn = "2044-3994",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Kuner, C, Cate, FH, Lynskey, O, Millard, C, Loideain, NN & Svantesson, DJB 2018, 'Blockchain versus data protection', International Data Privacy Law, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 103-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy009

Blockchain versus data protection. / Kuner, Christopher; Cate, Fred H; Lynskey, Orla; Millard, Christopher; Loideain, Nora Ni; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, 02.07.2018, p. 103-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blockchain versus data protection

AU - Kuner, Christopher

AU - Cate, Fred H

AU - Lynskey, Orla

AU - Millard, Christopher

AU - Loideain, Nora Ni

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

PY - 2018/7/2

Y1 - 2018/7/2

N2 - It is not uncommon for technological developments to give rise to debates as to whether existing legal norms and regulatory frameworks will be disrupted or undermined. A recent, high-profile, example is blockchain.Most of the popular excitement about blockchain, so far at least, relates to crypto-currencies, especially Bitcoin, and related financial products such as Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Less visibly, but probably more importantly in the long run, a great deal of investment is going into the development of a broad range of blockchain applications in contexts ranging from registration of assets (including land) to self-executing (‘smart’) contracts. Notwithstanding widespread confusion about what exactly blockchain is or might become, blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) have caught the imagination of governments, businesses, and private investors, and they are increasingly a focus of attention for legislators and regulators worldwide.

AB - It is not uncommon for technological developments to give rise to debates as to whether existing legal norms and regulatory frameworks will be disrupted or undermined. A recent, high-profile, example is blockchain.Most of the popular excitement about blockchain, so far at least, relates to crypto-currencies, especially Bitcoin, and related financial products such as Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Less visibly, but probably more importantly in the long run, a great deal of investment is going into the development of a broad range of blockchain applications in contexts ranging from registration of assets (including land) to self-executing (‘smart’) contracts. Notwithstanding widespread confusion about what exactly blockchain is or might become, blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) have caught the imagination of governments, businesses, and private investors, and they are increasingly a focus of attention for legislators and regulators worldwide.

U2 - 10.1093/idpl/ipy009

DO - 10.1093/idpl/ipy009

M3 - Editorial

VL - 8

SP - 103

EP - 104

JO - International Data Privacy Law

JF - International Data Privacy Law

SN - 2044-3994

IS - 2

ER -

Kuner C, Cate FH, Lynskey O, Millard C, Loideain NN, Svantesson DJB. Blockchain versus data protection. International Data Privacy Law. 2018 Jul 2;8(2):103-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipy009