Biodiversity offsets: Lessons from the American experience

Shelley Burgin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Banking) Bill 2006 was implemented to formalise the concept of biodiversity offsets. Its underpinning focus is to allow development in rapidly urbanising areas of the Sydney region and the coastal ribbon of New South Wales. Under defined circumstances biodiversity impacts due to urban development may be offset elsewhere, often in rural areas, where equivalent biodiversity values are identified. This legislation was modelled on the United States of America (US) wetland mitigation banking approach. I investigated some of the pitfalls of the US experience that should have been considered in the implementation of the New South Wales legislation and conclude that most issues appear to be associated with the narrowness of concepts around biodiversity, deficiencies in compliance, and long term monitoring and management of the offset ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)544-549
Number of pages6
JournalAustralian Zoologist
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

New South Wales
biodiversity
laws and regulations
banking
urban development
threatened species
rural areas
compliance
wetlands
ecosystems
monitoring
conservation banking

Cite this

Burgin, Shelley. / Biodiversity offsets : Lessons from the American experience. In: Australian Zoologist. 2011 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 544-549.
@article{781707bf5efe446c8ff5e01023095457,
title = "Biodiversity offsets: Lessons from the American experience",
abstract = "The New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Banking) Bill 2006 was implemented to formalise the concept of biodiversity offsets. Its underpinning focus is to allow development in rapidly urbanising areas of the Sydney region and the coastal ribbon of New South Wales. Under defined circumstances biodiversity impacts due to urban development may be offset elsewhere, often in rural areas, where equivalent biodiversity values are identified. This legislation was modelled on the United States of America (US) wetland mitigation banking approach. I investigated some of the pitfalls of the US experience that should have been considered in the implementation of the New South Wales legislation and conclude that most issues appear to be associated with the narrowness of concepts around biodiversity, deficiencies in compliance, and long term monitoring and management of the offset ecosystems.",
author = "Shelley Burgin",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.7882/AZ.2011.005",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "544--549",
journal = "Australian Zoologist",
issn = "0067-2238",
publisher = "Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales",
number = "3",

}

Biodiversity offsets : Lessons from the American experience. / Burgin, Shelley.

In: Australian Zoologist, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2011, p. 544-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity offsets

T2 - Lessons from the American experience

AU - Burgin, Shelley

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Banking) Bill 2006 was implemented to formalise the concept of biodiversity offsets. Its underpinning focus is to allow development in rapidly urbanising areas of the Sydney region and the coastal ribbon of New South Wales. Under defined circumstances biodiversity impacts due to urban development may be offset elsewhere, often in rural areas, where equivalent biodiversity values are identified. This legislation was modelled on the United States of America (US) wetland mitigation banking approach. I investigated some of the pitfalls of the US experience that should have been considered in the implementation of the New South Wales legislation and conclude that most issues appear to be associated with the narrowness of concepts around biodiversity, deficiencies in compliance, and long term monitoring and management of the offset ecosystems.

AB - The New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Amendment (Biodiversity Banking) Bill 2006 was implemented to formalise the concept of biodiversity offsets. Its underpinning focus is to allow development in rapidly urbanising areas of the Sydney region and the coastal ribbon of New South Wales. Under defined circumstances biodiversity impacts due to urban development may be offset elsewhere, often in rural areas, where equivalent biodiversity values are identified. This legislation was modelled on the United States of America (US) wetland mitigation banking approach. I investigated some of the pitfalls of the US experience that should have been considered in the implementation of the New South Wales legislation and conclude that most issues appear to be associated with the narrowness of concepts around biodiversity, deficiencies in compliance, and long term monitoring and management of the offset ecosystems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81755187617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7882/AZ.2011.005

DO - 10.7882/AZ.2011.005

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 544

EP - 549

JO - Australian Zoologist

JF - Australian Zoologist

SN - 0067-2238

IS - 3

ER -