Better use of primary care laboratory services following interventions to 'market' clinical guidelines in New Zealand: A controlled before-and-after study

Andrew Tomlin, Susan Dovey*, Robin Gauld, Murray Tilyard

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context:
Laboratory tests for inflammatory response, thyroid function and infectious diarrhoea were not being ordered as recommended by clinical guidelines.

Objective:
To measure changes in community laboratory-test ordering following marketing programmes promoting guidelines recommendations.

Design:
Controlled before-and-after study involving 2 years of national laboratory payment data before and after each intervention. Comparisons were with doctors ordering the same tests but not receiving interventions.

Setting:
New Zealand primary care.

Participants:
3161, 3140 and 3335 general practitioners and 2424, 2443 and 2766 Comparison doctors ordering inflammatory response, thyroid function and acute diarrhoea tests from community laboratories, July 2003 to March 2009.

Interventions:
Three separate marketing programmes to general practitioners, each comprising written material advising of guidelines recommendations, individual laboratory-test use feedback and professional development opportunities.

Main outcome measures:
Number of tests, tests/ doctor, patients having tests and tested patients/ doctor/year before and after each intervention. Change in expenditure from before each intervention to after.

Results:
For Intervention doctors, erythrocyte sedimentation rate tests decreased 60.0% after the intervention; tests for C-reactive protein increased 63.1%; simultaneous erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein orders decreased 32.6%. Tests for free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine decreased 44.1% and 36.0%. The proportion of thyroid function tests where thyroid-stimulating hormone was the sole test ordered increased from 43.2% before the intervention to 65.2% afterwards (p<0.001; 95% CI 21.7% to 22.2%). Testing for faecal culture decreased 31.5%, giardia and cryptosporidium 31.5%, and ova and parasites 56.9%. Faecal culture as the sole initial test increased from 31.4% to 39.1% (p<0.001; 95% CI 7.2% to 8.2%). Testing by Comparison doctors changed in the same direction but with significantly less magnitude. The estimated reduction in expenditure for study tests was 23.5%.

Conclusions:
Clear information marketed to general practitioners improved the quality of laboratory test ordering for patients in New Zealand.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-290
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Better use of primary care laboratory services following interventions to 'market' clinical guidelines in New Zealand: A controlled before-and-after study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this