Bargaining in the Shadow of the Folk Law: Expanding the Concept of the Shadow of the Law in Family Dispute Resolution

Jonathan Crowe, Rachael M Field, Lisa Toohey, Helen Partridge, Lynn McAllister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The idea that parties bargain in the shadow of the law has been highly
influential in research on dispute resolution and family law. Critics have
questioned the utility and coherence of the concept, but it continues to be
widely accepted. This article draws on an empirical study of access to
legal information in a post-separation context to argue for a broader and
more realistic understanding of how the shadow of the law influences
parties’ expectations and strategies in family law matters. Family dispute
resolution, we suggest, does not take place in the shadow of the positive
law (the law contained in statutes, case law and other formal legal
sources), so much as the shadow of the folk law (the law as depicted in
informal sources such as online materials and popular media). It follows
that there is not just one shadow of the law; rather, there are multiple
shadows. These findings hold important implications for government
agencies, family dispute resolution providers and others involved in
providing information and advice on post-separation issues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-338
Number of pages20
JournalThe Sydney Law Review
Volume40
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Law
family law
case law
statute
critic

Cite this

@article{1ac8cf05b27c4629a4221373ad762342,
title = "Bargaining in the Shadow of the Folk Law: Expanding the Concept of the Shadow of the Law in Family Dispute Resolution",
abstract = "The idea that parties bargain in the shadow of the law has been highlyinfluential in research on dispute resolution and family law. Critics havequestioned the utility and coherence of the concept, but it continues to bewidely accepted. This article draws on an empirical study of access tolegal information in a post-separation context to argue for a broader andmore realistic understanding of how the shadow of the law influencesparties’ expectations and strategies in family law matters. Family disputeresolution, we suggest, does not take place in the shadow of the positivelaw (the law contained in statutes, case law and other formal legalsources), so much as the shadow of the folk law (the law as depicted ininformal sources such as online materials and popular media). It followsthat there is not just one shadow of the law; rather, there are multipleshadows. These findings hold important implications for governmentagencies, family dispute resolution providers and others involved inproviding information and advice on post-separation issues.",
author = "Jonathan Crowe and Field, {Rachael M} and Lisa Toohey and Helen Partridge and Lynn McAllister",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "319--338",
journal = "The Sydney Law Review",
issn = "0082-0512",
publisher = "University of Sydney",
number = "3",

}

Bargaining in the Shadow of the Folk Law: Expanding the Concept of the Shadow of the Law in Family Dispute Resolution. / Crowe, Jonathan; Field, Rachael M; Toohey, Lisa; Partridge, Helen; McAllister, Lynn.

In: The Sydney Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 319-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bargaining in the Shadow of the Folk Law: Expanding the Concept of the Shadow of the Law in Family Dispute Resolution

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

AU - Field, Rachael M

AU - Toohey, Lisa

AU - Partridge, Helen

AU - McAllister, Lynn

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - The idea that parties bargain in the shadow of the law has been highlyinfluential in research on dispute resolution and family law. Critics havequestioned the utility and coherence of the concept, but it continues to bewidely accepted. This article draws on an empirical study of access tolegal information in a post-separation context to argue for a broader andmore realistic understanding of how the shadow of the law influencesparties’ expectations and strategies in family law matters. Family disputeresolution, we suggest, does not take place in the shadow of the positivelaw (the law contained in statutes, case law and other formal legalsources), so much as the shadow of the folk law (the law as depicted ininformal sources such as online materials and popular media). It followsthat there is not just one shadow of the law; rather, there are multipleshadows. These findings hold important implications for governmentagencies, family dispute resolution providers and others involved inproviding information and advice on post-separation issues.

AB - The idea that parties bargain in the shadow of the law has been highlyinfluential in research on dispute resolution and family law. Critics havequestioned the utility and coherence of the concept, but it continues to bewidely accepted. This article draws on an empirical study of access tolegal information in a post-separation context to argue for a broader andmore realistic understanding of how the shadow of the law influencesparties’ expectations and strategies in family law matters. Family disputeresolution, we suggest, does not take place in the shadow of the positivelaw (the law contained in statutes, case law and other formal legalsources), so much as the shadow of the folk law (the law as depicted ininformal sources such as online materials and popular media). It followsthat there is not just one shadow of the law; rather, there are multipleshadows. These findings hold important implications for governmentagencies, family dispute resolution providers and others involved inproviding information and advice on post-separation issues.

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 319

EP - 338

JO - The Sydney Law Review

JF - The Sydney Law Review

SN - 0082-0512

IS - 3

ER -