Australia’s media climate: Time to renegotiate control

Jane Johnston, Mark Pearson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2007, Australia was rated by two international media bodies as well down the chain in media freedom. Within its own borders, internal media groups—in particular the Australian Press Council and the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, as well as a consortium of major employer groups—have recently released reports investigating the position of media freedoms. This article examines a select few of these shrinking freedoms which range from the passive restrictions on access to documents to the overt threat of imprisonment for publishing sensitive material. In particular, it considers laws relating to freedom of information, camera access to courts, shield laws and whistleblower protection and finally, revamped anti-terrorism laws. The article maps the landscape of Australia’s downgraded press freedom and suggests that laws controlling media reportage need to be renegotiated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-88
Number of pages17
JournalPacific Journalism Review
Volume14
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Printing presses
Terrorism
Cameras
climate
Law
media law
freedom of information
imprisonment
entertainment
terrorism
employer
time
art
threat

Cite this

Johnston, J., & Pearson, M. (2008). Australia’s media climate: Time to renegotiate control. Pacific Journalism Review, 14(2), 72-88.
Johnston, Jane ; Pearson, Mark. / Australia’s media climate : Time to renegotiate control. In: Pacific Journalism Review. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 72-88.
@article{f0691762e6ad46ceaedc1d6dc8ddd299,
title = "Australia’s media climate: Time to renegotiate control",
abstract = "In 2007, Australia was rated by two international media bodies as well down the chain in media freedom. Within its own borders, internal media groups—in particular the Australian Press Council and the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, as well as a consortium of major employer groups—have recently released reports investigating the position of media freedoms. This article examines a select few of these shrinking freedoms which range from the passive restrictions on access to documents to the overt threat of imprisonment for publishing sensitive material. In particular, it considers laws relating to freedom of information, camera access to courts, shield laws and whistleblower protection and finally, revamped anti-terrorism laws. The article maps the landscape of Australia’s downgraded press freedom and suggests that laws controlling media reportage need to be renegotiated.",
author = "Jane Johnston and Mark Pearson",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "72--88",
journal = "Pacific Journalism Review",
issn = "1023-9499",
publisher = "Creative Industries Research Institute, AUT University",
number = "2",

}

Johnston, J & Pearson, M 2008, 'Australia’s media climate: Time to renegotiate control' Pacific Journalism Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 72-88.

Australia’s media climate : Time to renegotiate control. / Johnston, Jane; Pearson, Mark.

In: Pacific Journalism Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.12.2008, p. 72-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Australia’s media climate

T2 - Time to renegotiate control

AU - Johnston, Jane

AU - Pearson, Mark

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - In 2007, Australia was rated by two international media bodies as well down the chain in media freedom. Within its own borders, internal media groups—in particular the Australian Press Council and the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, as well as a consortium of major employer groups—have recently released reports investigating the position of media freedoms. This article examines a select few of these shrinking freedoms which range from the passive restrictions on access to documents to the overt threat of imprisonment for publishing sensitive material. In particular, it considers laws relating to freedom of information, camera access to courts, shield laws and whistleblower protection and finally, revamped anti-terrorism laws. The article maps the landscape of Australia’s downgraded press freedom and suggests that laws controlling media reportage need to be renegotiated.

AB - In 2007, Australia was rated by two international media bodies as well down the chain in media freedom. Within its own borders, internal media groups—in particular the Australian Press Council and the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, as well as a consortium of major employer groups—have recently released reports investigating the position of media freedoms. This article examines a select few of these shrinking freedoms which range from the passive restrictions on access to documents to the overt threat of imprisonment for publishing sensitive material. In particular, it considers laws relating to freedom of information, camera access to courts, shield laws and whistleblower protection and finally, revamped anti-terrorism laws. The article maps the landscape of Australia’s downgraded press freedom and suggests that laws controlling media reportage need to be renegotiated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938594244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 72

EP - 88

JO - Pacific Journalism Review

JF - Pacific Journalism Review

SN - 1023-9499

IS - 2

ER -