Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts

Rob Marc Orr, Rodney Pope

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationResearchpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In general police officers there were no significant differences in absolute or relative loads across the four different load conditions, but female officers (mean ranges=13-17% BW) typically carried heavier relative loads than male officers (mean ranges = 10-14% BW).

For marksmanship tasks, soldiers considered that their loads had a small negative impact on their marksmanship ability.

Specialist police officers employing both primary and secondary weapons reported no significant differences in marksmanship, yet, individually, there was a weak to moderate negative correlation between perceptions of load carriage impacts on performance and actual marksmanship scores (primary r=-0.347: secondary r=-0.631) and this varied depending on marksmanship plane (x versus y-axis).

General police officers performed similarly in three different ILAV and in standard station wear (p=.118).

Of note, the officer’s perceptions that they shot better with ILAVB compared to all other conditions was accurate.

While soldiers perceived mobility to be the most impacted by load carriage, this was observed to be the case in a specialist but not general police victim drag. The loads carried by soldiers and law enforcement officers vary widely. The impacts of loads on occupational task performance also vary, with the available research suggesting heavier loads have greater performance impacts.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2017
Event4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance - Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Duration: 28 Nov 20171 Dec 2017
Conference number: 4th
https://www.jsams.org/issue/S1440-2440(17)X0004-2 (ICSPP Abstracts in the JSAMS (2017), Vol. 20, suppl. 2)

Conference

Conference4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance
Abbreviated titleICSPP2017
CountryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period28/11/171/12/17
OtherThe ICSPP is the most important international conference in applied military human performance research and therefore attracts experts from all over the world. The congress covers a broad range of disciplines including physical training programs and adaptations, occupational and physical performance, testing and assessment, injury prevention, public health and health promotion, nutritional considerations, human factors, ergonomics, equipment design, biomechanics, load carriage, gender integration issues, thermoregulation and environmental issues, deployment considerations, and psychological and cognitive factors. The 4th ICSPP applied a lifecycle theme whereby symposia, poster sessions and featured science sessions by international experts were organized across key areas including recruitment, training, operational deployment and sustainment.
Internet address

Fingerprint

police officer
soldier
performance
law enforcement
weapon
police
ability

Cite this

Orr, R. M., & Pope, R. (2017). Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts. 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance , Melbourne, Australia.
Orr, Rob Marc ; Pope, Rodney. / Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts. 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance , Melbourne, Australia.
@conference{03781e44337b44e0bf4c3de1cad5c687,
title = "Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts",
abstract = "In general police officers there were no significant differences in absolute or relative loads across the four different load conditions, but female officers (mean ranges=13-17{\%} BW) typically carried heavier relative loads than male officers (mean ranges = 10-14{\%} BW). For marksmanship tasks, soldiers considered that their loads had a small negative impact on their marksmanship ability. Specialist police officers employing both primary and secondary weapons reported no significant differences in marksmanship, yet, individually, there was a weak to moderate negative correlation between perceptions of load carriage impacts on performance and actual marksmanship scores (primary r=-0.347: secondary r=-0.631) and this varied depending on marksmanship plane (x versus y-axis). General police officers performed similarly in three different ILAV and in standard station wear (p=.118). Of note, the officer’s perceptions that they shot better with ILAVB compared to all other conditions was accurate. While soldiers perceived mobility to be the most impacted by load carriage, this was observed to be the case in a specialist but not general police victim drag. The loads carried by soldiers and law enforcement officers vary widely. The impacts of loads on occupational task performance also vary, with the available research suggesting heavier loads have greater performance impacts.",
author = "Orr, {Rob Marc} and Rodney Pope",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "28",
language = "English",
note = "4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance , ICSPP2017 ; Conference date: 28-11-2017 Through 01-12-2017",
url = "https://www.jsams.org/issue/S1440-2440(17)X0004-2",

}

Orr, RM & Pope, R 2017, 'Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts' 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance , Melbourne, Australia, 28/11/17 - 1/12/17, .

Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts. / Orr, Rob Marc; Pope, Rodney.

2017. 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance , Melbourne, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts

AU - Orr, Rob Marc

AU - Pope, Rodney

PY - 2017/11/28

Y1 - 2017/11/28

N2 - In general police officers there were no significant differences in absolute or relative loads across the four different load conditions, but female officers (mean ranges=13-17% BW) typically carried heavier relative loads than male officers (mean ranges = 10-14% BW). For marksmanship tasks, soldiers considered that their loads had a small negative impact on their marksmanship ability. Specialist police officers employing both primary and secondary weapons reported no significant differences in marksmanship, yet, individually, there was a weak to moderate negative correlation between perceptions of load carriage impacts on performance and actual marksmanship scores (primary r=-0.347: secondary r=-0.631) and this varied depending on marksmanship plane (x versus y-axis). General police officers performed similarly in three different ILAV and in standard station wear (p=.118). Of note, the officer’s perceptions that they shot better with ILAVB compared to all other conditions was accurate. While soldiers perceived mobility to be the most impacted by load carriage, this was observed to be the case in a specialist but not general police victim drag. The loads carried by soldiers and law enforcement officers vary widely. The impacts of loads on occupational task performance also vary, with the available research suggesting heavier loads have greater performance impacts.

AB - In general police officers there were no significant differences in absolute or relative loads across the four different load conditions, but female officers (mean ranges=13-17% BW) typically carried heavier relative loads than male officers (mean ranges = 10-14% BW). For marksmanship tasks, soldiers considered that their loads had a small negative impact on their marksmanship ability. Specialist police officers employing both primary and secondary weapons reported no significant differences in marksmanship, yet, individually, there was a weak to moderate negative correlation between perceptions of load carriage impacts on performance and actual marksmanship scores (primary r=-0.347: secondary r=-0.631) and this varied depending on marksmanship plane (x versus y-axis). General police officers performed similarly in three different ILAV and in standard station wear (p=.118). Of note, the officer’s perceptions that they shot better with ILAVB compared to all other conditions was accurate. While soldiers perceived mobility to be the most impacted by load carriage, this was observed to be the case in a specialist but not general police victim drag. The loads carried by soldiers and law enforcement officers vary widely. The impacts of loads on occupational task performance also vary, with the available research suggesting heavier loads have greater performance impacts.

M3 - Presentation

ER -

Orr RM, Pope R. Australian Tactical Loads and their Operational Impacts. 2017. 4th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance , Melbourne, Australia.