Australian Clinical Legal Education: Designing and Operating a Best Practice Clinical Program in an Australian Law School by Adrian Evans, Anna Cody, Anna Copeland, Jeff Giddings, Peter Joy, Mary Anne Noone and Simon Rice

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The book provides a fresh look at Clinical Legal Education (CLE) in Australia in 2017, and examines the diverse factors which influence law clinics during a time when many disruptions are occurring in higher education. The authors argue that clinics make numerous contributions to Australian legal education, including fostering student awareness of concepts of justice and how the law and legal processes impact on people. They express the view that CLE can challenge a contemporary overemphasis on screen-based learning, particularly in cases where learning is purely technology-based without human interaction. They also argue persuasively that CLE is potentially the major disruptor of traditional law schools’ core functions, by challenging some of the accepted norms in traditional learning in law, such as a reliance on case law and teaching by way of a formal lecture. As the book is the result of research report prepared by the authors with funding from the National Office of Learning and Teaching, it is based on extensive and thorough research in the area of CLE in Australia. The book also considers the complex issues associated with enhancing law students’ public-interest professionalism in an Australian context, and offers practical guidance on how to construct and operate a ‘best practice’ CLE program for the benefit of various stakeholders, including regulators, law deans, associate deans, law teachers and students.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages4
JournalAustralian Journal of Clinical Education
Volume2
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

school law
best practice
Law
education
learning
legal process
student
Teaching
case law
public interest
funding
justice
stakeholder
teacher
interaction

Cite this

@article{a6c7a19f88824aeabca612dff5cf522d,
title = "Australian Clinical Legal Education: Designing and Operating a Best Practice Clinical Program in an Australian Law School by Adrian Evans, Anna Cody, Anna Copeland, Jeff Giddings, Peter Joy, Mary Anne Noone and Simon Rice",
abstract = "The book provides a fresh look at Clinical Legal Education (CLE) in Australia in 2017, and examines the diverse factors which influence law clinics during a time when many disruptions are occurring in higher education. The authors argue that clinics make numerous contributions to Australian legal education, including fostering student awareness of concepts of justice and how the law and legal processes impact on people. They express the view that CLE can challenge a contemporary overemphasis on screen-based learning, particularly in cases where learning is purely technology-based without human interaction. They also argue persuasively that CLE is potentially the major disruptor of traditional law schools’ core functions, by challenging some of the accepted norms in traditional learning in law, such as a reliance on case law and teaching by way of a formal lecture. As the book is the result of research report prepared by the authors with funding from the National Office of Learning and Teaching, it is based on extensive and thorough research in the area of CLE in Australia. The book also considers the complex issues associated with enhancing law students’ public-interest professionalism in an Australian context, and offers practical guidance on how to construct and operate a ‘best practice’ CLE program for the benefit of various stakeholders, including regulators, law deans, associate deans, law teachers and students.",
author = "Francina Cantatore",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Australian Journal of Clinical Education",
issn = "2207-4791",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Australian Clinical Legal Education: Designing and Operating a Best Practice Clinical Program in an Australian Law School by Adrian Evans, Anna Cody, Anna Copeland, Jeff Giddings, Peter Joy, Mary Anne Noone and Simon Rice

AU - Cantatore, Francina

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The book provides a fresh look at Clinical Legal Education (CLE) in Australia in 2017, and examines the diverse factors which influence law clinics during a time when many disruptions are occurring in higher education. The authors argue that clinics make numerous contributions to Australian legal education, including fostering student awareness of concepts of justice and how the law and legal processes impact on people. They express the view that CLE can challenge a contemporary overemphasis on screen-based learning, particularly in cases where learning is purely technology-based without human interaction. They also argue persuasively that CLE is potentially the major disruptor of traditional law schools’ core functions, by challenging some of the accepted norms in traditional learning in law, such as a reliance on case law and teaching by way of a formal lecture. As the book is the result of research report prepared by the authors with funding from the National Office of Learning and Teaching, it is based on extensive and thorough research in the area of CLE in Australia. The book also considers the complex issues associated with enhancing law students’ public-interest professionalism in an Australian context, and offers practical guidance on how to construct and operate a ‘best practice’ CLE program for the benefit of various stakeholders, including regulators, law deans, associate deans, law teachers and students.

AB - The book provides a fresh look at Clinical Legal Education (CLE) in Australia in 2017, and examines the diverse factors which influence law clinics during a time when many disruptions are occurring in higher education. The authors argue that clinics make numerous contributions to Australian legal education, including fostering student awareness of concepts of justice and how the law and legal processes impact on people. They express the view that CLE can challenge a contemporary overemphasis on screen-based learning, particularly in cases where learning is purely technology-based without human interaction. They also argue persuasively that CLE is potentially the major disruptor of traditional law schools’ core functions, by challenging some of the accepted norms in traditional learning in law, such as a reliance on case law and teaching by way of a formal lecture. As the book is the result of research report prepared by the authors with funding from the National Office of Learning and Teaching, it is based on extensive and thorough research in the area of CLE in Australia. The book also considers the complex issues associated with enhancing law students’ public-interest professionalism in an Australian context, and offers practical guidance on how to construct and operate a ‘best practice’ CLE program for the benefit of various stakeholders, including regulators, law deans, associate deans, law teachers and students.

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

VL - 2

JO - Australian Journal of Clinical Education

JF - Australian Journal of Clinical Education

SN - 2207-4791

ER -