Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates

Georgina M E Dawson, Ryan Broad, Rob Marc Orr

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationResearch

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Question:
Does the length of a recruit training program influence
injury rates?
Design:
Retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded within a oneyear
period during two different Army recruit training course types – the
Australian Recruit 80 day Course (ARC), and the Australian Soldier 100 day
Course (ASC).
Participants:
Participants were 267 Australian Regular Army recruits
undertaking Basic Training in 2013 (ARC n=194: ASC n=73).
Intervention: Exposure to Army recruit training programs of varying
lengths, with minimal other differences.
Outcome Measures:
Reported rates, types and mechanisms of injuries
were collected. Rates included injury prevalence (number of reported
injuries/number of personnel completing respective course x100) and
injury incidence (number of injuries/100 recruits completing the respective
course/course length in days x 100).
Results: Injury prevalence for ASC recruits was 17.8% and for ARC recruits
13.9%. Injury incidence for the ASC and ARC were 17.8 injuries and 17.4
injuries /100 soldiers/100 days respectively. While the majority of injuries
for both courses were sprains and strains, the leading mechanisms of
injury differed.
Conclusions: Longer, less intensive recruit training programs may be
associated with similar rates of injury per unit time as shorter, more
intensive programs. As such, greater proportions of recruits may be injured
across longer programs.
Key Practice Points:
• Lengthening a recruit training program with the aim of making it less
intensive may not reduce the proportion of recruits injured – in fact,
a higher proportion is likely to be injured due to the longer period of
exposure to training.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015
EventThe Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015: Connect - Gold Coast, Australia
Duration: 3 Oct 20156 Oct 2015
Conference number: 2015
http://www.physiotherapy.asn.au/Conference2015

Conference

ConferenceThe Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015
Abbreviated titleAPA
CountryAustralia
CityGold Coast
Period3/10/156/10/15
Internet address

Fingerprint

Military Personnel
AIDS-Related Complex
Wounds and Injuries
Education
Sprains and Strains
Incidence
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

Dawson, G. M. E., Broad, R., & Orr, R. M. (2015). Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates. The Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015, Gold Coast, Australia.
Dawson, Georgina M E ; Broad, Ryan ; Orr, Rob Marc. / Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates. The Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015, Gold Coast, Australia.
@conference{ebfacc7bf3124548ac353a6d9555a146,
title = "Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates",
abstract = "Question: Does the length of a recruit training program influenceinjury rates?Design: Retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded within a oneyearperiod during two different Army recruit training course types – theAustralian Recruit 80 day Course (ARC), and the Australian Soldier 100 dayCourse (ASC).Participants: Participants were 267 Australian Regular Army recruitsundertaking Basic Training in 2013 (ARC n=194: ASC n=73).Intervention: Exposure to Army recruit training programs of varyinglengths, with minimal other differences.Outcome Measures: Reported rates, types and mechanisms of injurieswere collected. Rates included injury prevalence (number of reportedinjuries/number of personnel completing respective course x100) andinjury incidence (number of injuries/100 recruits completing the respectivecourse/course length in days x 100).Results: Injury prevalence for ASC recruits was 17.8{\%} and for ARC recruits13.9{\%}. Injury incidence for the ASC and ARC were 17.8 injuries and 17.4injuries /100 soldiers/100 days respectively. While the majority of injuriesfor both courses were sprains and strains, the leading mechanisms ofinjury differed.Conclusions: Longer, less intensive recruit training programs may beassociated with similar rates of injury per unit time as shorter, moreintensive programs. As such, greater proportions of recruits may be injuredacross longer programs.Key Practice Points:• Lengthening a recruit training program with the aim of making it lessintensive may not reduce the proportion of recruits injured – in fact,a higher proportion is likely to be injured due to the longer period ofexposure to training.",
author = "Dawson, {Georgina M E} and Ryan Broad and Orr, {Rob Marc}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
language = "English",
note = "The Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015 : Connect, APA ; Conference date: 03-10-2015 Through 06-10-2015",
url = "http://www.physiotherapy.asn.au/Conference2015",

}

Dawson, GME, Broad, R & Orr, RM 2015, 'Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates' The Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015, Gold Coast, Australia, 3/10/15 - 6/10/15, .

Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates. / Dawson, Georgina M E; Broad, Ryan; Orr, Rob Marc.

2015. The Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015, Gold Coast, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationResearch

TY - CONF

T1 - Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates

AU - Dawson, Georgina M E

AU - Broad, Ryan

AU - Orr, Rob Marc

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Question: Does the length of a recruit training program influenceinjury rates?Design: Retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded within a oneyearperiod during two different Army recruit training course types – theAustralian Recruit 80 day Course (ARC), and the Australian Soldier 100 dayCourse (ASC).Participants: Participants were 267 Australian Regular Army recruitsundertaking Basic Training in 2013 (ARC n=194: ASC n=73).Intervention: Exposure to Army recruit training programs of varyinglengths, with minimal other differences.Outcome Measures: Reported rates, types and mechanisms of injurieswere collected. Rates included injury prevalence (number of reportedinjuries/number of personnel completing respective course x100) andinjury incidence (number of injuries/100 recruits completing the respectivecourse/course length in days x 100).Results: Injury prevalence for ASC recruits was 17.8% and for ARC recruits13.9%. Injury incidence for the ASC and ARC were 17.8 injuries and 17.4injuries /100 soldiers/100 days respectively. While the majority of injuriesfor both courses were sprains and strains, the leading mechanisms ofinjury differed.Conclusions: Longer, less intensive recruit training programs may beassociated with similar rates of injury per unit time as shorter, moreintensive programs. As such, greater proportions of recruits may be injuredacross longer programs.Key Practice Points:• Lengthening a recruit training program with the aim of making it lessintensive may not reduce the proportion of recruits injured – in fact,a higher proportion is likely to be injured due to the longer period ofexposure to training.

AB - Question: Does the length of a recruit training program influenceinjury rates?Design: Retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded within a oneyearperiod during two different Army recruit training course types – theAustralian Recruit 80 day Course (ARC), and the Australian Soldier 100 dayCourse (ASC).Participants: Participants were 267 Australian Regular Army recruitsundertaking Basic Training in 2013 (ARC n=194: ASC n=73).Intervention: Exposure to Army recruit training programs of varyinglengths, with minimal other differences.Outcome Measures: Reported rates, types and mechanisms of injurieswere collected. Rates included injury prevalence (number of reportedinjuries/number of personnel completing respective course x100) andinjury incidence (number of injuries/100 recruits completing the respectivecourse/course length in days x 100).Results: Injury prevalence for ASC recruits was 17.8% and for ARC recruits13.9%. Injury incidence for the ASC and ARC were 17.8 injuries and 17.4injuries /100 soldiers/100 days respectively. While the majority of injuriesfor both courses were sprains and strains, the leading mechanisms ofinjury differed.Conclusions: Longer, less intensive recruit training programs may beassociated with similar rates of injury per unit time as shorter, moreintensive programs. As such, greater proportions of recruits may be injuredacross longer programs.Key Practice Points:• Lengthening a recruit training program with the aim of making it lessintensive may not reduce the proportion of recruits injured – in fact,a higher proportion is likely to be injured due to the longer period ofexposure to training.

M3 - Presentation

ER -

Dawson GME, Broad R, Orr RM. Australian Army recruit training: course length and recruit injury rates. 2015. The Australian Physiotherapy Association Conference 2015, Gold Coast, Australia.