Atypical employment: A comparison of Japan and the United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

As of February, 1993, nonregular employees accounted for 20.8%
of Japan's total work force;' in the United States, 17.5% of workers
were part-timers. 2 Therefore, part-time employees, temporary workers,
dispatched laborers, and other nonregular, non full-time employees
comprise a significant portion of the labor force of these two countries.
The rise of atypical employment,3 which refers to work other than
regular full-time employment, necessitates an inquiry into the economic
and legal environments in which nonregular employees now live.

This article is a comparative analysis of atypical employment in
Japan and the United States. These two countries have been chosen
because each has a significant nonregular work force and is a developed
nation representing the East and the West, respectively. The discussion here highlights the legal protections which nonregular employees receive
in these countries and the areas of atypical employment requiring greater
regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-525
Number of pages33
JournalComparative Labor Law Journal
Volume17
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Japan
employee
work force
temporary worker
legal protection
labor force
time

Cite this

@article{a71658768b1a46f9bdf03778e41cd90f,
title = "Atypical employment: A comparison of Japan and the United States",
abstract = "As of February, 1993, nonregular employees accounted for 20.8{\%}of Japan's total work force;' in the United States, 17.5{\%} of workerswere part-timers. 2 Therefore, part-time employees, temporary workers,dispatched laborers, and other nonregular, non full-time employeescomprise a significant portion of the labor force of these two countries.The rise of atypical employment,3 which refers to work other thanregular full-time employment, necessitates an inquiry into the economicand legal environments in which nonregular employees now live.This article is a comparative analysis of atypical employment inJapan and the United States. These two countries have been chosenbecause each has a significant nonregular work force and is a developednation representing the East and the West, respectively. The discussion here highlights the legal protections which nonregular employees receivein these countries and the areas of atypical employment requiring greaterregulation.",
author = "Lo, {Vai Io}",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "492--525",
journal = "Comparative Labor Law Journal",
number = "2",

}

Atypical employment : A comparison of Japan and the United States. / Lo, Vai Io.

In: Comparative Labor Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1996, p. 492-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Atypical employment

T2 - A comparison of Japan and the United States

AU - Lo, Vai Io

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - As of February, 1993, nonregular employees accounted for 20.8%of Japan's total work force;' in the United States, 17.5% of workerswere part-timers. 2 Therefore, part-time employees, temporary workers,dispatched laborers, and other nonregular, non full-time employeescomprise a significant portion of the labor force of these two countries.The rise of atypical employment,3 which refers to work other thanregular full-time employment, necessitates an inquiry into the economicand legal environments in which nonregular employees now live.This article is a comparative analysis of atypical employment inJapan and the United States. These two countries have been chosenbecause each has a significant nonregular work force and is a developednation representing the East and the West, respectively. The discussion here highlights the legal protections which nonregular employees receivein these countries and the areas of atypical employment requiring greaterregulation.

AB - As of February, 1993, nonregular employees accounted for 20.8%of Japan's total work force;' in the United States, 17.5% of workerswere part-timers. 2 Therefore, part-time employees, temporary workers,dispatched laborers, and other nonregular, non full-time employeescomprise a significant portion of the labor force of these two countries.The rise of atypical employment,3 which refers to work other thanregular full-time employment, necessitates an inquiry into the economicand legal environments in which nonregular employees now live.This article is a comparative analysis of atypical employment inJapan and the United States. These two countries have been chosenbecause each has a significant nonregular work force and is a developednation representing the East and the West, respectively. The discussion here highlights the legal protections which nonregular employees receivein these countries and the areas of atypical employment requiring greaterregulation.

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 492

EP - 525

JO - Comparative Labor Law Journal

JF - Comparative Labor Law Journal

IS - 2

ER -